Visitor
Score

Portraits, band promos, landscapes, live music. General all arounder


John-Dettinger | Asked  over a year ago | Last response was 7 months ago

I began photography around 11 months ago. I currently have the entry level Nikon D3100. It has done me well,  but the low light capabilities are pathetic. I can barely even shoot at 400 iso without having a horrible "swiss cheese" picture. It was a good starting camera, but if I want to progress in my photography, especially my low light , I need a new body. And fyi, I did buy some faster lenses. They help remarkably, but still not to the level I need/want  to be. And feel as if the D3100 cant produce sharp/ better quality images.  Im not rich otherwise I would just get a pro/full frame body. So im stuck with medium quality. Help me! Should I save for the D300s or go with the D7000. Im open to any other suggestions as well. Thanks 

Tags:

Which camera do you recommend for John-Dettinger?

Nikon D300S - $1,270
12.2 MP|APS-C CMOS|3" LCD
Nikon D7000 - $897
16.1 MP|APS-C CMOS|3" LCD
3 Answers
  1. Intermediate I
    Nikon D7000
    Evangelist
    Score
    7 months ago mezopia recommends the Nikon D7000

    Dont hesitate, go for nikon D7000, its much much better than D300s for much lower price. You will get good high iso performance, better image quality and a lighter camera. So if your worries are all about noises, D7000 will handle the job perfectly for you. But if you are worried about sharpness, then changing bodies or lenses might not be a help for you; since you as the photographer play an important role in getting sharp images, I can provide you with hundreds of images taken with D3100 that are sharp and have good image quality. So as a friend I also advice you to study more about how your camera works and what is its limits and how you can tweak it to get the most out of it. Anyhow I wish you luck on your future career. 

    Reply
  2. Beginner II
    Nikon D7000
    Supporter
    Score
    a year ago maxmichel-de recommends the Nikon D7000

    I've got the d7000 and im really happy with it. 39 focuspoints are more than enough! The low light performance of D7000 is said to be better than of the D300s, the handling combines many entry-level features (Dial with shooting-modes) with some features of the "pro-Line" (Dial with shutter-mode). The body feels very tough and relyable.

    Nikon also improved the RGB-Sensor. (D300s: 1.005 pxl, D7000 2.016pxl).

    One thing may be interesting for you: There are rumours that nikon will release a D600 (FX), which seems to be a FX-Sensor in a D7000. Price is said to be 1500$ maybe lower. Release-Date: shortly before Photokina in Sept 2012.

    www.nikonrumors.com

    some pictures i've taken with D7000 (17.12.2011 and younger, i took the "older" ones with my "granny" D70s):

    http://wuerzburg.nightfever-online.de/?i=248/

    Reply
  3. Expert III
    cameras Community
    Fair Minded
    -2
    Score
    over a year ago Philip-Davis recommends the Nikon D7000

    I don't have experience with either camera... but the stats show that the D7000 is better in every way (except for number of focus points).  Image quality is better and low light performance is better.

    Reply