Visitor
Score

Portraits and general photography


Michael-Fernau | Asked  over a year ago | Last response was 9 months ago

Been using nikon cameras since 1976 have a d300s and wondering if I need to take a jump and buy a d800?

Tags:

Which camera do you recommend for Michael-Fernau?

Nikon D300S - $1,270
12.2 MP|APS-C CMOS|3" LCD
Nikon D800 - $2,797
36.2 MP|Full frame CMOS|3.2" LCD
4 Answers
  1. Beginner I
    Score
    a year ago antonioamaro recommends neither camera

    D800 is an amazing camera but maybe is not the best camera for a portrait photographer that is not a fashion photographer and so doesn't need the to blow their photos as much . 

    The extreme definition of the D800 call for very good quality lenses, like the 85mm 1.4g or the 105 micro 2.8, or even the 70-200 2.8,  in order to take in full advantage of that quality. The result with the D800, at least for portrait, are that one can see all the small skin imperfections all the, sometimes undesirable skin texture and details, that have to be corrected afterwords on photoshop. Your camera with the 85mm 1.8g will give amazing results if combined with a good workflow on photoshop or equivalent software. On the other side the d800 have not yet resolve all the problems related with the small pixel size and noise that let for instance that the canon 5dIII with less MP (22MP vs 36MP) but bigger pixels, win the race (for most applications at least...).

    Have a great day, (and good photos to...)

    António Amaro

    1. Intermediate I
      11 months ago Henri-De-Vreese
      In RAW, D800 beats 5D up to iso 6400, above, the 5D takes the lead. I would never recomend shooting above iso 6400 so for me D800 wins, even at iso.
    2. Intermediate I
      11 months ago Henri-De-Vreese
      (check Dxo-mark, Nikon at www.dxomark.com ) D800 is good up to 2853 and 5D mk3 to 2293: makes D800 even better at iso than the 5D mk3.
    Reply
  2. Beginner I
    Score
    a year ago JUngerPhoto recommends the Nikon D90

    I recently upgraded from the D90 to the D800 as I am moving more towards making this my career and prefer to shoot full frame which you can not do with the d90. With that being said I love the D800 and it's capabilities but unless you plan on shooting professionally and making mural sized prints it may be to much camera.  For general day to day use I shoot with one of the small mirrorless cameras which is not only light weight but is more than capable of portrait and general photography. 

    If you feel the need for brand loyalty to Nikon look at the d90 which is an amazing camera IMO significantly better than the d7000 & d5100 (which are a bit gimicky and overrated) otherwise check out one of the mirrorless systems by Olympus or canon rebel series

    1. Visitor
      7 months ago Amir-Hajdar
      d90 is better than d7000? When you make a comment like this, one starts to wonder about the rest of your comment. I own d7000 and played with d90 as well, and I cannot think of any reason why I would opt for d90 unless slight difference in price is an issue.
    Reply
  3. Expert I
    cameras Community
    Fair Minded
    Score
    9 months ago nick recommends the Nikon D600

    also try considering the awaited low cost FX body to save cost

    Reply
  4. Intermediate III
    cameras Community
    Fair Minded
    Score
    11 months ago John-Kim recommends the Nikon D300S

    D800 is simply the best tool currently available for studio portrait photographers.

    Additional factors to consider are: (1) D800 RAW files are huge; therefore, you will need to beef up your computer's processing power and storage; (2) you'll need to upgrade your lenses to FX lenses.

    D300s is still a great camera and if it meets your current needs, you need to ask yourself, what is the reason for the upgrade? 

     

    1. Intermediate II
      11 months ago heuscher
      That you are asking such a huge question without any explanation suggests to me you've made your mind up or haven't the slightest clue what to do. I suggest you wait. D300s is now an ageing camera but it's still a really good one; a D90 would be taking a leap backwards! $3,000 might buy an amazing camera with the D800, but you'll need FX lenses to match if you don't already. $3000 can also buy amazing lenses and other gear: and they'll probably last longer and retain their value better after 4-5 years. There's a Nikon FX rumoured to be the D600 on the horizon it seems, maybe. Word is around September, but like many D300s owners, you've been waiting a long time for that DX upgrade that might never happen. The rumoured D600 seems to be targeted at enthusiasts like yourself. If you needed to upgrade to the D800 you would know. I would wait until the end of the year to see if it comes out given you're seemingly not being pressed to make a decision and have a good camera.
    Reply