Visitor
-1
Score

WHAT SHOULD I BUY?


Rahul-Das | Asked  a year ago | Last response was 6 months ago

IF I HAVE A BUDGET OF BOTH WHAT SHOULD I BUY?

Which camera do you recommend for Rahul-Das?

Nikon D3200 - $547
24.1 MP|APS-C CMOS|3" LCD
Sony SLT-A37 - $549
16 MP|APS-C CMOS|2.6" LCD
5 Answers
  1. Beginner II
    Sony SLT-A37
    Supporter
    Score
    11 months ago Jeffrey-Vladimir-So recommends the Sony SLT-A37

    Though shutter lag time may be shorter on the Nikon D3200, any decent street photographer would leave their camera on, as excellent street shots are one in a million and can't wait for you to turn your camera on. 

    Addressing your first need (street photography), burst mode on the Sony a37 is at 5.5fps or 7fps at telephoto crop. Nikon D3200 is 4fps. The Sony a37's faster burst rate will help you capture street photos with greater accuracy, along with better phase-detection autofocus accuracy over the Nikon D3200. Also the Sony a37 has sensor shift compensation technology, meaning you can walk or even run with the camera and still take shake-free photos as the sensor compensates for your movement. This compensation works with all lenses that Sony and Konica Minolta offers and allows you to take sharp photos even in sub-par conditions (like dark evening shots) that require longer shutter speeds. The Nikon D3200 provides no vibration compensation in body. It requires the lens to compensate for movements (like walking or running which you do on the street) and not all of Nikon's lenses offer vibration reduction. Only "VR" lenses from Nikon offer compensation for running or walking, and VR lenses are significantly more expensive than regular Nikon lenses that provide no compensation for movement. This restricts the conditions that you will be able to take shake free photographs while on the move.

    Sony a37 also wins for landscape photography. The built-in panorama and HD panorama mode offers panoramic shots without the need for an extreme wide-angle lens. Nikon D3200 offers no panoramic stitching and will require expensive software and precise skill in order to create landscape photographs that the Sony a37 offers automatically. Nikon D3200 probably wins by slight margin over Sony a37 for outdoor shots. The higher megapixel count allows better cropping (however not necessarily better image quality). The Nikon D3200 is also known for exceptional color reproduction, which helps when taking pictures of wildlife or plants.

    However, the Sony a37's screen tilts, allowing high or low angle shots during bright sunlight. The D3200's screen is fixed, making sunlight an issue as it may cause glare more often than Sony's tilting screen.

    1. Expert III
      11 months ago Philip-Davis
      BTW, shutter lag is the time between you pressing the shutter button and the shutter actually opening. Sounds like you were thinking of startup delay. Also, I'm not sure how many photographers take a picture while they're running... but using a fast shutter speed like 1/400 will eliminate any hint of camera shake while you're chasing down (or running away from) your subject.
    2. Beginner II
      11 months ago Jeffrey-Vladimir-So
      that is a valid point that high shutter speeds eliminate any hint of camera shake. however light conditions do not always allow for fast shutter speeds, even at max aperture. therefore the sony allows for shake free pictures at sub-optimal conditions. and paparazzi take pictures while running, just throwing it out there since he is interested in street photography and sensor shift makes quite a difference between a usable and unusable shot while on the move.. yes that is true, i mistook shutter lag for startup time, my apologies.
    Reply
  2. Beginner I
    Score
    6 months ago Nischal-sharma recommends the Sony SLT-A37

    Features compared to D3200 is far more better . image quality in low light is just fantastic . not 2 for get 15 af points and 7 fps . one can also adjust shutter speed n aperture on lie video . So sony is the winner 

    Reply
  3. Intermediate I
    cameras Community
    Fair Minded
    Score
    8 months ago Tor-Tojed recommends the Sony SLT-A37

    Sony A37 is a better solution than D3200 at least for the ''street photography'' - if you are happy with the kit-lens (if you don't need other, more expensive and versatile lenses such are macro and extreme telephotos, wheres Nikon has the upper hand), Sony A37 will make slightly better looking photos, especially in low light indoors and is more ''stable'' than D3200 thanks to non-movable mirror.
    Reply
  4. Beginner II
    Sony SLT-A37
    Supporter
    Score
    11 months ago yudhir-khanal recommends the Sony SLT-A37

    Get Sony..Definitely and with 100$ extra spend on a decent prime lens (fixed fast lens) which will be excellent for street photography too.

    Reply
  5. Beginner II
    Nikon D3200
    Supporter
    Score
    11 months ago Sanjay-Bajaj recommends the Nikon D3200

    Dear Rahul,

    The Nikon D3200 is better buy compared to A37, the shutter lag time, the Color contrast Video output + not to mention the image quality output is better plus the advantage of wider variety of lens makes Nikon a better choice

    1. Beginner II
      11 months ago Jeffrey-Vladimir-So
      Video ouput is not better on the Nikon D3200. No AVCHD, no 60i output, D3200's 24p output is the same as the A37. Also, Nikon D3200 video still shows rolling shutter, moire lines, and combing artefacts. Also sound on the D3200 is mono input, Sony a37 is stereo. Movie mode is not phase detect, causing dependency on contrast detection which is significantly slower than the Sony a37's constant phase detection.
    2. Expert III
      11 months ago Philip-Davis
      Rahul asked about street photography and landscapes. No mention of video.
    3. Beginner II
      11 months ago Jeffrey-Vladimir-So
      i was clarifying sanjay's claim of better video output on the nikon d3200. rahul can completely dismiss my comment on video ifhe desires, i just wanted to correct misleading information.
    4. Intermediate I
      8 months ago Tor-Tojed
      For those who want to buy a Nikon camera becuse of already owned lenses and accessories: avoid buying D3200 - buy D5100 instead. These are the reasons: -D3200 has a very obvious ''warm'' noise even at the modest levels of ISO (light sensitivity) -D5100 performs much better than D3200 in ''low light'' conditions (D5100 utilises a photocell of a higher qiality - the cell that is build into a D7000 too) -The difference in pixel count is unimportant here
    Reply