Other people have already said it but I'll say it again. You need better glass (invest in a L-series lens) to really get the images your looking for. The 60D is a great camera, I've owned two of them in the past, and to be honest with you, it and the T4i are virtually the same camera. The firmware on the T4i is a little nicer and the 60D is just a tad bigger so it feels better in my hands and minus a few minor differences, both cameras will give you a quality image.
My biggest "aha moment" with photography was putting on an L-series lens on my dslr. Now mind you, good lenses are quite expensive, but I've witnessed too many people giving up on photography because they made the leap of purchasing a prosumer camera, but didn't think to put on a pro lens. I could even make the case that you would be better off downgrading to the T3i and saving up for some quality glass.Which camera do you recommend for kkbbcarlson?
-
-
Hi there, I have both cameras and I would recommend you to keep the 60D. What you need however is a fast lens like a 70-200 f2.8 L for those shots on the dirt bike tracks, mind you this lens is expensive, but I'm sure you'll love it. The lens your 60D came with is not bad, it's just not fast enough.
Do not worry, you bought a great camera, get to know her and I'm sure you'll find out soon enogh how great it is
-
Stick with the 60D. When shooting sports you need good High ISO capability which the 60D clearly has the T4I beat. It also beats the T4I in color depth which will make your colors look more lifelike and real. One thing when shooting sport pictures is use manual setting. (Keep the ISO below 3200) and when shooting football you want a shutter speed of about 400 (320 will be fine if you have panning IS), and the Largest aperture possible (2.8 is best). I shoot photos for multiple High-schools in my area for them to use in their yearbook and Newspaper. I also shoot photos for a website that Newspapers and News-stations use when they don’t want to send their own photographer. And when I am at these events I use the 60D with the 70-200mm f/2.8L (And since this camera not full frame I get a 1.6 crop so it adds to 320mm), and the 5D mk2 with the 24-70mm f/2.8L. I would highly recommend using the 60D because it is a lot simpler then the 5D. Settings: Night Shutter Speed: 400 Aperture: 2.8 (Or largest available) ISO 3200 (Set maximum Auto ISO to 3200 and then set Camera to Auto ISO) Day: I would use Aperture Priority and set the aperture to 3.2(Or as close to that as you can go) and depending on if its sunny or cloudy set the ISO to 400-600 and let the Shutter change automatically as needed Shutter Speed: 1250 Aperture: 3.2 ISO: 400 (Try to keep it at about 400. Anything below that the colors aren’t as Vibrant and anything above 800 starts to get Noise) -
You are asking for fast shutter speeds and higher quality images in high-ISO images.
While the ISO is a factor of the camera sensor (and the 60D packs a capable sensor), fast shutter speeds at low-light conditions require a fast lens. Consider a fixed-aperture (for ex: f2.8 or f4.0) lens.
Since you are also gonna be shooting from the sidelines, you need a lens with a good telephoto ability.
Canon makes high-quality lenses in L series that feature 200mm - 400mm telephoto range and fast apertures. Beware that you will find these lenses costing many times more than your camera itself.
-
I'd say keep what you have. With 5.3 fps continuous shooting, it's slightly better than the T4i, but of course falls short of the 7D (which, as you noted, is half a grand more). The fast max shutter speed is better as well. I think you made the right choice as far as taking football pictures and action shots. Low light sensitivity won't all be that great comparatively though. Most football fields are pretty lit up though. See if you can get on the sidelines!
-
this is a good camera they are both close to being the same the 60 is a little better much faster shutter speed for sports its the person behind the camera and the glass in the front of the camera that make the camera work
-
The 7D has faster autofocus and can shoot continuous bursts of 8 frames per second (for three seconds -- with the latest firmware). So if you were going to exchange cameras, you might want to check out the 7D.
-
Visitor9 months ago kkbbcarlsonThe 7D is roughly another $400-500, is it worth it? I had an idea of what I wanted, bought something else and now am more confused. With the 60D I got a 70-300mm 1:4-5.6..Should I get something else? -
Expert III9 months ago Philip-DavisThe low-light quality of the 7D is not going to be significantly different than the 60D. Have you tried taking nighttime football photos with the 60D and 70-300mm yet? -
Visitor9 months ago kkbbcarlsonI have not. I just bought the camera last night and woke up with buyer's remorse after going on internet and researching other cameras. I will try to take some pictures tonight and see what happens. Thank you for all you help!
-
-
Keep your 60D because exchanging it for the T4i won't get you better photos. If you want your low-light photos to really sing then you'll want to add something like a 70-200mm f/2.8 lens.
-
Keep the 60D. The noise at high ISO would be much lower, which is critical for sports photography. I would recommend you buy a 135mm f/2.8 or 200mm f/2.8 for sports as well.
- According to the snapsort comparison site, the 60D has a much larger sensor, and 20% more pixels.
-
buy a zoom lens ! better for action ,sports photography !


