- Conclusion Get the lowdown
- Features How they compare
- Performance Real world benchmarks
- Differences Technical showdown
- Reviews Word on the street
- Competition Others to consider
- Discussion Answers and opinions
Compare with...
- Canon EOS 7D
- Canon PowerShot IXUS 125 HS
- Canon IXUS 230 HS
- Fujifilm FinePix XP50
- Sony Cyber-shot DSC-H55
Rated 60% by by c|net (Aug, 2009)It is very compact and lightweight, effortlessly slipped into a pocket or bag.
Rated 80% by by Cyan--Lulipop (Apr, 2011)It takes amazing photos and the telephoto makes for very interesting shots.
Conclusion Which is better for you?
Features Key features of the Fujifilm FinePix Z33WP compared to the Fujifilm FinePix XP20
MP10
1/2"
megapixels
| 0 MP | 14 MP | 20 MP |
FinePix Z33WP by Chad-Baker--darkbeach72 (Sep, 2009)All shooting conditions being equal, I would prefer to have a 5 megapixel image from my Lumix rather than a 10 megapixel image from the Fuji FinePix.
FinePix XP20 by Chris (Feb, 2012)Remember: megapixels don't mean squat if you don't have a decent lens, auto-focus system, processor, memory card, etc..
wide angle lens
FinePix XP20 by Glenn-Oliver-Dettman (Mar, 2012)From a water proof perspective, it worked flawlessly, and we have both photos and video from under water on our vacation.
aperture size
FinePix XP20 by c|net (Oct, 2011)There's some minor barrel distortion at the wide end, but otherwise, given its protective glass, the lens is reasonably sharp at the center and consistent edge to edge.
zoom range
| 0x | 5x | 5x |
FinePix Z33WP by C.-Ochsner (Oct, 2009)Since I was snorkeling and floating on top of the water bobbing up and down, fighting against the current and using mostly the zoom feature my expectation was a lot of blurred pictures.
FinePix XP20 by YourNameHere (Apr, 2012)Figured I'd take a chance on this camera, I do a good bit of kayaking and was hoping I might get a decent waterproof with abit of optical zoom.
body size
92 x 60 x 21 mm
99 x 68 x 24 mm
FinePix Z33WP by whoareyou (Mar, 2009)The tiny size and lightweightness of the Fuji Z33 WP are perfect for pocket portability.
FinePix XP20 by c|net (Oct, 2011)However, as a secondary camera for those times when you need a pocket camera that can get wet, dusty, or cold, or might need to survive a drop, it's an OK option.
Performance Real world tests of Fujifilm FinePix Z33WP vs Fujifilm FinePix XP20
max continuous shooting
FinePix Z33WP by c|net (Aug, 2009)The continuous shooting speed is sluggish, too, at 0.3 frames per second.
FinePix XP20 by c|net (Oct, 2011)About the fastest thing it does is shoot a burst of three photos in 1.3 seconds.
Differences What are the advantages of each
Advantages compared to the XP20
| Faster lens | f/3.7 | vs | f/3.9 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Around 10% faster aperture; Better in low light | |||
| More highly reviewed by consumers | 70.38% | vs | 62.94% |
| More than 10% more highly reviewed by consumers | |||
| Better macro lens | 80 mm | vs | 90 mm |
| More than 10% closer macro focus; Take great close-up photos | |||
| Significantly lighter | 110 g | vs | 162 g |
| More than 30% lighter | |||
| Smaller | 92 x 60 x 21 mm | vs | 99 x 68 x 24 mm |
| Around 30% smaller | |||
| Thinner | 21 mm | vs | 24 mm |
| More than 10% thinner | |||
Advantages compared to the Z33WP
| Much larger zoom range | 5x | vs | 3x |
|---|---|---|---|
| Around 70% larger zoom; Great for sports or nature when your subject is further away | |||
| Image stabilization | Sensor shift | vs | None |
| Supports image stabilization | |||
| Significantly wider lens | 28 mm | vs | 35 mm |
| 20% wider focal length | |||
| Marginally more recently announced | Jan, 2012 | vs | Feb, 2009 |
| Announced date over 2 years later | |||
| Is weather sealed | Yes | vs | No |
| Somewhat common; Keep shooting in rain or snow | |||
| Significantly higher resolution | 14 MP | vs | 10 MP |
| More than 40% higher resolution; Capture more detail, good for large prints | |||
| Higher definition video | HD video | vs | standard-def video |
| Great video; great for displaying on a large flat panel TV | |||
| Automatic panorama | Yes | vs | No |
| Somewhat common; Stitches together multiple photos into a single ultra-wide view | |||
| Higher light sensitivity | 3,200 ISO | vs | 1,600 ISO |
| 2x higher light sensitivity; Avoid blur in low light situations | |||
Reviews Word on the street
Fujifilm FinePix Z33WP | Fujifilm FinePix XP20 | ||
![]() |
|
| |
|---|---|---|---|
![]() | Rated 80% by by A.-Bailey (Jul, 2009) Rated 20% by by P.-Wiklanski--reading-rider (Aug, 2009) Rated 100% by by Shandel--Shan (May, 2009) | Rated 80% by by J.-Gardner (Dec, 2011) Rated 80% by by R.-Zamudio (Aug, 2011) Rated 100% by by photoman (Jun, 2011) | |
Competition What else you should consider
| | 4 | Fujifilm FinePix XP50 Supports HDR |
| | 6 | Olympus Tough TG-320 Create realistic 3D images |
| | 8 | Kodak EasyShare Z885 9-way tie: Doesn't have a built-in flash |
Discussions Get involved, ask your question about the Fujifilm FinePix Z33WP and Fujifilm FinePix XP20
Popular tags:
|








