- Conclusion Get the lowdown
- Features How they compare
- Performance Real world benchmarks
- Differences Technical showdown
- Reviews Word on the street
- Competition Others to consider
- Discussion Answers and opinions
Compare with...
- Sony NEX-5N
- Sony NEX-5R
- Sony Cybershot DSC-RX100
- Canon PowerShot S110
- Nikon 1 V1
Rated 69% by by DPReview (Jan, 2012)If you're a keen social photographer though, typically taking pictures in low interior lighting, the J1 offers by far the better handling experience of the two 1 System cameras thanks to its built-in flash.
Rated 80% by by Photography Blog (Dec, 2012)In terms of low light shots, though the top whack setting of ISO25600 produces very gritty looking images, detail is fairly well maintained and the tell-tale watercolour look usually seen at higher ISOs is well avoided.
Conclusion Which is better for you?
Features Key features of the Nikon 1 J1 compared to the Canon EOS M
MP10
Nikon CX
Rated 80% by by Photography Blog (Oct, 2011)Still, in our view the J1 is a better fit in many ways for its intended audience who will perhaps appreciate the built-in flash, simple control layout, stylish looks and svelte dimensions rather more than some of those so-called "missing" features.
17.9 MP
APS-C
Rated 80% by by TrustedReviews (Jul, 2012)As might be expected from an APS-C camera manufactured by Canon, overall image quality is very good indeed.
megapixels
| 0 MP | 17.9 MP | 20 MP |
1 J1 by DPReview (Jan, 2012)That said, with an absolute resolution of approximately 2000 LPH (Lines Per Picture Height) their 10MP sensor does a decent, if not outstanding job in our resolution test, partly helped by fairly strong default sharpening.
EOS M by Photography Blog (Dec, 2012)All of the sample images in this review were taken using the 18 megapixel Fine JPEG setting, which gives an average image size of around 6Mb.
sensor size
1 J1 by Photography Blog (Oct, 2011)During the review, the Nikon 1 J1 captured images of very high quality, especially if you consider the size of its sensor.
EOS M by DPReview (Jul, 2012)Preview based on a pre-production Canon EOS M. It's now almost four years since Panasonic first introduced us to the mirrorless interchangeable lens camera, in the shape of the Micro Four Thirds Lumix DMC-G1.
body size
106 x 61 x 30 mm
109 x 66 x 32 mm
1 J1 by Photography Blog (Oct, 2011)With an essentially grip-less design, the Nikon J1 is very much a two-handed affair that requires you to hold the camera's weight in the left hand, clutching the lens, and use your right hand for balance and operating the controls.
EOS M by techtwI've been weighing the mirrorless option heavy and finally made the plunge to keep it in the Canon family.
focus points
| 0 | 135 | 200 |
1 J1 by c|net (Sep, 2011)In the complete auto AF, it selects the focus points quickly, but inconsistently; for any given scene, it will choose different sets of points each time you prefocus.
EOS M by TrustedReviews (Jul, 2012)The way this works is that the faster phase-detect AF points are used to acquire initial focus, which is then fine-tuned by the more precise contrast-detect system.
Performance Real world tests of Nikon 1 J1 vs Canon EOS M
DxOMark image quality
1 J1 by DPReview (Jan, 2012)As we'd expect from Nikon's DSLR and Coolpix ranges the cameras' auto WB behavior consistently produces generally accurate colors and natural, attractive skin tones, too.
EOS M by Photography Blog (Dec, 2012)Sharpness, contrast, saturation and colour tone can be individually adjusted for each.
DxOMark low light performance
1 J1 by Cristina (Dec, 2011)I wanted a camera that takes good pictures at night and now I can say I've got one!
continuous shooting
EOS M by TrustedReviews (Jul, 2012)Shooting at the EOS M’s top burst speed of 4.3fps we were only able to capture 11 consecutive JPEGs (or five Raw images) before the buffer filled and the frame rate dropped to well below the headline rate.
battery life
230 photos
230 photos
1 J1 by Michael-Horn--mikie (Apr, 2012)After 9 days of continuous shooting using the built in flash - and HD video - the most disappointing feature was short battery life - the battery failing before my 8Gb video card was filled on one day - my purchase before the trip - much to my regret did not include a second battery.
EOS M by Gerald-J.-Skrocki--Jerry-S (Dec, 2012)If I had to criticize one feature it would be the battery life.
Differences What are the advantages of each
Advantages compared to the Canon EOS M
| Much faster rapid fire | 60 fps | vs | 4.3 fps |
|---|---|---|---|
| Around 14x faster continuous shooting; Take photos in rapid succession to capture motion | |||
| Many more phase-detection focus points | 135 | vs | 0 |
| 135 more phase detection focus points; Faster autofocus in reasonably lit settings | |||
| Significantly less startup delay | 1,400 ms | vs | 2,900 ms |
| 2.1x less startup delay; Be ready for anything | |||
| Shoots high speed video | Yes | vs | No |
| Somewhat common; Create slow motion video | |||
| Has a built-in flash | Built in flash | vs | None |
| About half of cameras have a built-in flash; Take photos in low-light with no extra gear | |||
| Much faster max shutter speed | 1/16000 s | vs | 1/4000 s |
| 4x faster max shutter speed; capture fast action | |||
Advantages compared to the Nikon 1 J1
| Larger sensor | APS-C | vs | Nikon CX |
|---|---|---|---|
| Around 3x larger sensor; higher quality photos | |||
| Much higher resolution screen | 1,040 k dots | vs | 460 k dots |
| Around 2.5x higher resolution screen | |||
| Much higher light sensitivity | 25,600 ISO | vs | 3,200 ISO |
| 8x higher light sensitivity; Avoid blur in low light situations | |||
| Has a flash hot shoe | Generic | vs | Fewer choices in how to light your subject |
| Most cameras have a flash hot shoe; Connect a variety of external flashes for maximum lighting flexibility | |||
| Has a touch screen | Yes | vs | No |
| Somewhat common; Fewer buttons, interact directly with menus | |||
| Better overall image quality | 65.0 | vs | 56.0 |
| Around 20% better image quality | |||
| Much higher resolution | 17.9 MP | vs | 10 MP |
| Around 80% higher resolution; Capture more detail, good for large prints | |||
| Has an external mic jack | 3.5mm | vs | None |
| Most cameras don't have an external mic jack | |||
| Significantly more contrast-detection focus points | 31 | vs | 0 |
| 31 more contrast detection focus points; Better autofocus in low light settings | |||
| Significantly less noise at high ISO | 827 ISO | vs | 372 ISO |
| More than 2x higher low light performance | |||
| Shoots video in 24p | Yes | vs | No |
| Somewhat common; For that film look | |||
| Supports HDR | Yes | vs | No |
| Somewhat common; Combines multiple photos together to capture both bright and dark areas | |||
| Marginally more recently announced | Jul, 2012 | vs | Sep, 2011 |
| Announced date 10 months later | |||
| More highly reviewed by consumers | 77.69% | vs | 72.61% |
| Around 10% more highly reviewed by consumers | |||
| More color depth | 22.1 bits | vs | 21.5 bits |
| Almost the same | |||
| Longer long exposure | 60 s | vs | 30 s |
| 2x longer long exposure; Capture creative photos such as night sky movement | |||
Reviews Word on the street
Nikon 1 J1 | Canon EOS M | ||
![]() |
|
| |
|---|---|---|---|
![]() |
|
| |
![]() | Rated 80% by by Robert-Cullers--RCullers Rated 100% by by Ronald-M.-Piekosz--Human-Being (Mar, 2012) Rated 80% by by Kentucky-Rose | Rated 100% by by techtw Rated 100% by by domdocs (Dec, 2012) Rated 60% by by Moosu (Mar, 2013) | |
Competition What else you should consider
| | 1 | Sony NEX-5N Least noise at high ISO |
| | 2 | Sony NEX-5R Best image quality as rated by DXOMark |
| | 5 | Nikon 1 V1 Has a viewfinder |
| | 6 | Nikon 1 J2 Many many cross-type focus points |
| | 7 | Sony NEX-3 3-way tie: Has a flip out screen |
| | 8 | Samsung NX1000 Largest sensor |









