Compare with...

  • Sony NEX-5N
  • Sony NEX-5R
  • Sony Cybershot DSC-RX100
  • Canon PowerShot S110
  • Nikon 1 V1
Front view of Nikon 1 J1

Nikon 1 J1

« Change
vs
Front view of Canon EOS M

Canon EOS M

Change »
$397
  • 10 MP
  • Nikon CX CMOS
  • 3" LCD
Released September, 2011
If you're a keen social photographer though, typically taking pictures in low interior lighting, the J1 offers by far the better handling experience of the two 1 System cameras thanks to its built-in flash.
Rated 69% by by DPReview (Jan, 2012)
 
$599
  • 17.9 MP
  • APS-C CMOS
  • 3" LCD
Released September, 2012
In terms of low light shots, though the top whack setting of ISO25600 produces very gritty looking images, detail is fairly well maintained and the tell-tale watercolour look usually seen at higher ISOs is well avoided.
Rated 80% by by Photography Blog (Dec, 2012)
 

Conclusion Which is better for you?

72%
83%
View Details
?
?
View Details
77%
57%
View Details
73%
78%
View Details

Winner

Nikon1 J1

61
56

Features Key features of the Nikon 1 J1 compared to the Canon EOS M

MP10

Nikon CX

Back view of Nikon 1 J1
Still, in our view the J1 is a better fit in many ways for its intended audience who will perhaps appreciate the built-in flash, simple control layout, stylish looks and svelte dimensions rather more than some of those so-called "missing" features.
Rated 80% by by Photography Blog (Oct, 2011)
Angle view of Canon EOS M

17.9 MP

APS-C

As might be expected from an APS-C camera manufactured by Canon, overall image quality is very good indeed.
Rated 80% by by TrustedReviews (Jul, 2012)

megapixels

0 MP
17.9 MP

10 MP
20 MP
That said, with an absolute resolution of approximately 2000 LPH (Lines Per Picture Height) their 10MP sensor does a decent, if not outstanding job in our resolution test, partly helped by fairly strong default sharpening.
1 J1 by DPReview (Jan, 2012)
All of the sample images in this review were taken using the 18 megapixel Fine JPEG setting, which gives an average image size of around 6Mb.
EOS M by Photography Blog (Dec, 2012)

sensor size

Nikon 1 J1
Canon EOS M
During the review, the Nikon 1 J1 captured images of very high quality, especially if you consider the size of its sensor.
1 J1 by Photography Blog (Oct, 2011)
Preview based on a pre-production Canon EOS M. It's now almost four years since Panasonic first introduced us to the mirrorless interchangeable lens camera, in the shape of the Micro Four Thirds Lumix DMC-G1.
EOS M by DPReview (Jul, 2012)

body size

106 x 61 x 30 mm
109 x 66 x 32 mm
With an essentially grip-less design, the Nikon J1 is very much a two-handed affair that requires you to hold the camera's weight in the left hand, clutching the lens, and use your right hand for balance and operating the controls.
1 J1 by Photography Blog (Oct, 2011)
I've been weighing the mirrorless option heavy and finally made the plunge to keep it in the Canon family.
EOS M by techtw

focus points

0
135

31
200
In the complete auto AF, it selects the focus points quickly, but inconsistently; for any given scene, it will choose different sets of points each time you prefocus.
1 J1 by c|net (Sep, 2011)
The way this works is that the faster phase-detect AF points are used to acquire initial focus, which is then fine-tuned by the more precise contrast-detect system.
EOS M by TrustedReviews (Jul, 2012)
 

Performance Real world tests of Nikon 1 J1 vs Canon EOS M

DxOMark image quality

Nikon 1 J1
Canon EOS M
As we'd expect from Nikon's DSLR and Coolpix ranges the cameras' auto WB behavior consistently produces generally accurate colors and natural, attractive skin tones, too.
1 J1 by DPReview (Jan, 2012)
Sharpness, contrast, saturation and colour tone can be individually adjusted for each.
EOS M by Photography Blog (Dec, 2012)

DxOMark low light performance

Nikon 1 J1
Canon EOS M
I wanted a camera that takes good pictures at night and now I can say I've got one!
1 J1 by Cristina (Dec, 2011)
Low light images are incredible and far outperform my 4 year old DSLR.
EOS M by domdocs (Dec, 2012)

continuous shooting

60 fps
4.3 fps
Burst shot is fast enough to shoot a running kids.
1 J1 by Take1 (Mar, 2012)
Shooting at the EOS M’s top burst speed of 4.3fps we were only able to capture 11 consecutive JPEGs (or five Raw images) before the buffer filled and the frame rate dropped to well below the headline rate.
EOS M by TrustedReviews (Jul, 2012)

battery life

230 photos
230 photos
After 9 days of continuous shooting using the built in flash - and HD video - the most disappointing feature was short battery life - the battery failing before my 8Gb video card was filled on one day - my purchase before the trip - much to my regret did not include a second battery.
1 J1 by Michael-Horn--mikie (Apr, 2012)
If I had to criticize one feature it would be the battery life.
EOS M by Gerald-J.-Skrocki--Jerry-S (Dec, 2012)
 

Differences What are the advantages of each

Advantages compared to the Canon EOS M

Much faster rapid fire 60 fps vs 4.3 fps
Around 14x faster continuous shooting; Take photos in rapid succession to capture motion
Many more phase-detection focus points 135 vs 0
135 more phase detection focus points; Faster autofocus in reasonably lit settings
Significantly less startup delay 1,400 ms vs 2,900 ms
2.1x less startup delay; Be ready for anything
Shoots high speed video Yes vs No
Somewhat common; Create slow motion video
Has a built-in flash Built in flash vs None
About half of cameras have a built-in flash; Take photos in low-light with no extra gear
Much faster max shutter speed 1/16000 s vs 1/4000 s
4x faster max shutter speed; capture fast action

Advantages compared to the Nikon 1 J1

Larger sensor APS-C vs Nikon CX
Around 3x larger sensor; higher quality photos
Much higher resolution screen 1,040 k dots vs 460 k dots
Around 2.5x higher resolution screen
Much higher light sensitivity 25,600 ISO vs 3,200 ISO
8x higher light sensitivity; Avoid blur in low light situations
Has a flash hot shoe Generic vs Fewer choices in how to light your subject
Most cameras have a flash hot shoe; Connect a variety of external flashes for maximum lighting flexibility
Has a touch screen Yes vs No
Somewhat common; Fewer buttons, interact directly with menus
Better overall image quality 65.0 vs 56.0
Around 20% better image quality
Much higher resolution 17.9 MP vs 10 MP
Around 80% higher resolution; Capture more detail, good for large prints
Has an external mic jack 3.5mm vs None
Most cameras don't have an external mic jack
Significantly more contrast-detection focus points 31 vs 0
31 more contrast detection focus points; Better autofocus in low light settings
Significantly less noise at high ISO 827 ISO vs 372 ISO
More than 2x higher low light performance
Shoots video in 24p Yes vs No
Somewhat common; For that film look
Supports HDR Yes vs No
Somewhat common; Combines multiple photos together to capture both bright and dark areas
Marginally more recently announced Jul, 2012 vs Sep, 2011
Announced date 10 months later
More highly reviewed by consumers 77.69% vs 72.61%
Around 10% more highly reviewed by consumers
More color depth 22.1 bits vs 21.5 bits
Almost the same
Longer long exposure 60 s vs 30 s
2x longer long exposure; Capture creative photos such as night sky movement

Reviews Word on the street

Nikon 1 J1

Canon EOS M

Rated 80%
Read the review (Oct, 2011)
720p/60fps. In addition to being capable of shooting regular movies in HD quality, the Nikon 1 J1 can also shoot video at 400fps for slow-motion playback.
Rated 80%
Read the review (Dec, 2012)
The Canon EOS M is a new compact system camera that boasts 18 megapixels, full 1080p high-definition videos with continuous auto-focusing, and a touch-screen interface.
Rated 70%
Read the review (Sep, 2012)
Read the review (Sep, 2011)
Using the J1 next to an Olympus E-PL3, with both the kit zoom on each camera set to 28mm and focused on a static subject we found the area behind to be visibly more defocused and ‘blurry’ on the E-PL3 than the J1 at.
Rated 80%
Read the review (Jul, 2012)
Overall build quality is very good too, with much of the body constructed from magnesium alloy.
Rated 83% by 101 users at amazon.com
The Nikon 1 J1 camera has excellent picture quality (including raw files), is extremely fast focusing and has fast shooting rates (up to 60 frames per second).
Rated 80% by by Robert-Cullers--RCullers
Depth of field is thick, the image sensors do a good job focusing on what you want to focus on.
Rated 100% by by Ronald-M.-Piekosz--Human-Being (Mar, 2012)
I also purchased the 30mm-110mm lens and have been very happy with the quality of the pictures.
Rated 80% by by Kentucky-Rose
Rated 73% by 13 users at amazon.com
The Good: I love the image quality, size, and build quality of the camera and even the 22mm itself is a much better build then expected.
Rated 100% by by techtw
The choice of dedicated EOS-M lenses is fine and those looking to continue with existing EF lenses will find that the mount works brilliantly.
Rated 100% by by domdocs (Dec, 2012)
First off, I'm a pro photographer and was looking for something compact that delivered high quality RAW images without pulling out my DSLR.
Rated 60% by by Moosu (Mar, 2013)

Discussions Get involved, ask your question about the Nikon 1 J1 and Canon EOS M

Nikon
J1
Canon
M

Select aspects that are most important to you: (max 3)

Popular tags: