Compare with...

  • Nikon D600
  • Nikon D4
  • Nikon D800
  • Nikon D7000
  • Canon EOS 5D Mark III
Front view of Nikon D3

Nikon D3

« Change
vs
Front view of Canon EOS 1D X

Canon EOS 1D X

Change »
$9,999
  • 12.1 MP
  • Full frame CMOS
  • 3" LCD
Released August, 2007
Battery life is so good I sometimes forget to charge them up.
Rated 100% by by David-Saffir (Jan, 2009)
 
$6,799
  • 17.9 MP
  • Full frame CMOS
  • 3.2" LCD
Released March, 2012
Just as impressive is the way the 1D X’s sensor manages to resolve detail at high ISOs, particularly up to ISO 25,600.
Rated 90% by by TrustedReviews (Sep, 2012)
 

Conclusion Which is better for you?

87%
100%
View Details
40%
60%
92%
96%
View Details
93%
89%
View Details

Winner

CanonEOS 1D X

78
86

Features Key features of the Nikon D3 compared to the Canon EOS 1D X

MP12.1

Full frame

Back view of Nikon D3
It's anything but a lightweight, but I've been carrying large Nikons around for many years, so that is not a disincentive for me.
Rated 80% by by San-Diego-Photo-Enthusiast--Steve (Aug, 2008)
Back view of Canon EOS 1D X

17.9 MP

Full frame

From the blazing processing speeds of the dual DIGIC 5 processors to the class-leading 12fps Continuous shooting speed and exceptional high ISO performance the EOS-1D X really is everything Canon claims it to be.
Rated 90% by by TrustedReviews (Sep, 2012)

megapixels

0 MP
17.9 MP

12.1 MP
20 MP
If you're willing to step down to 5 megapixels, Nikon says that the D3 can achieve 11fps in DX crop mode (we only test at full resolution).
D3 by c|net (Jul, 2008)
I used the 5D2 alongside the 1D4 in Jasper and found the 1D4 images were crisper, had better color and were overall more pleasing even though the megapixels are less.
EOS 1D X by Primus (Dec, 2012)

sensor size

Nikon D3
Canon EOS 1D X
But of course you get a lot more than that too; this is a full frame camera that offers D2X resolution with a larger, far better sensor.
D3 by DPReview (Apr, 2008)
focus system the best ever from Canon IQ is the best i have seen easy menu system great build on the bodyvery happy with the camera use for wildlife shooting and with the full frame for landscape also...I can see this would be a fantastic camera for weddings also.
EOS 1D X by Gary-W.-Meyer (Oct, 2012)

viewfinder size

Nikon D3
Canon EOS 1D X
The large viewfinder and 5:4 professional crop is especially nice.
D3 by LKN4WAR--CRUCE-SIGNATI (Feb, 2012)
Thankfully, the 1D X’s viewfinder is superb with a big, bright window providing 100% frame coverage, a 0.76x magnification and the usual diopter correction controls.
EOS 1D X by TrustedReviews (Sep, 2012)

body size

160 x 157 x 88 mm
158 x 164 x 83 mm
The air is very thin at the top of the SLR tree, and essentially the D3 has no directly comparable competitors.
D3 by DPReview (Apr, 2008)
While seasoned pros should be used to the size and weight, well-heeled enthusiasts looking for the best camera money can buy may well find it a bit cumbersome.
EOS 1D X by TrustedReviews (Sep, 2012)

focus points

0
61

51
70
The D3's 51-point autofocus with 15 cross-type sensors delivers a major upgrade over the D2Xs's 11-point AF system.
D3 by c|net (Jul, 2008)
The 1D X’s AF system is almost identical to the one used by the EOS-5D Mk III and benefits from a total of 61 AF-points, 41 of which are cross-type sensors for faster and more accurate focusing regardless of whether the camera is being held in portrait of landscape orientation.
EOS 1D X by TrustedReviews (Sep, 2012)
 

Performance Real world tests of Nikon D3 vs Canon EOS 1D X

DxOMark image quality

Nikon D3
Canon EOS 1D X
At lower ISO settings the image quality isn't significantly different to most other 12 megapixel models, though Nikon's fairly conservative approach to image processing - not too much sharpening, not too much saturation, not too much contrast - means that JPEGs are a little flatter 'out of camera' than most.
D3 by DPReview (Apr, 2008)
Not sure how well that would work on subjects moving in the dark, as it might mess up your night vision (though red is the color least likely to break your night vision).
EOS 1D X by Stephen-M.-Lerch (Aug, 2012)

DxOMark low light performance

Nikon D3
Canon EOS 1D X
I know everyone praises the low light abilities and they are outstanding.
D3 by S.-D.-Perry (Jan, 2008)
The Shutter speed and low light ability are amazing.
EOS 1D X by louismetzger (Sep, 2012)

continuous shooting

9 fps
14 fps
In continuous shooting mode, we were able to capture 37 frames in 3.3 seconds for an average of 8.6 frames per second at full resolution.
D3 by c|net (Jul, 2008)
Used in Case 3 and firing off a burst of shots just as the subject entered the frame we managed to attain an exceptionally high hit-rate of pin-sharp images.
EOS 1D X by TrustedReviews (Sep, 2012)

battery life

4,300 photos
1,500 photos
If you can charge a battery, and read the quick start section, this camera can take good pictures almost by itself.
D3 by G.-Patrick-Byers--Show-and-Tell (Jun, 2008)
Battery life is less than optimal, so count on bringing a second battery to your typical model shoot... you get a little over 1100 pics per fully charged battery pack.
EOS 1D X by lankynibbs (Apr, 2013)
 

Differences What are the advantages of each

Advantages compared to the Canon EOS 1D X

Many more photos per charge 4,300 vs 1,500
2800 more shots; Longer battery life
Much more highly reviewed by consumers 92.93% vs 88.57%
Almost the same
Better dynamic range 12.2 ev vs 11.8 ev
Almost the same
Lighter 1,300 g vs 1,530 g
Around 20% lighter

Advantages compared to the Nikon D3

Marginally more recently announced Oct, 2011 vs Aug, 2007
Announced date over 4 years later
Much larger screen 3.2" vs 3"
Around 10% larger screen
Shoots video HD video vs None
Most cameras shoot video
Much higher light sensitivity 204,800 ISO vs 25,600 ISO
8x higher light sensitivity; Avoid blur in low light situations
Significantly higher resolution screen 1,040 k dots vs 922 k dots
More than 10% higher resolution screen
Significantly faster rapid fire 14 fps vs 9 fps
Around 60% faster continuous shooting; Take photos in rapid succession to capture motion
Significantly more cross-type focus points 41 vs 15
26 more cross type focus points; Easier and faster focusing in low light
Self cleaning sensor Yes vs No
Somewhat common; Prevents dust showing up in your photos
Significantly bigger viewfinder 0.76x vs 0.7x
Around 10% bigger viewfinder size
Supports HDR Yes vs No
Somewhat common; Combines multiple photos together to capture both bright and dark areas
Higher resolution 17.9 MP vs 12.1 MP
Around 50% higher resolution; Capture more detail, good for large prints
Less noise at high ISO 2,786 ISO vs 2,290 ISO
More than 20% higher low light performance
More color depth 23.8 bits vs 23.5 bits
Almost the same
More phase-detection focus points 61 vs 51
10 more phase detection focus points; Faster autofocus in reasonably lit settings
Thinner 83 mm vs 88 mm
Around 10% thinner

Reviews Word on the street

Nikon D3

Canon EOS 1D X

Rated 92% by 39 users at amazon.com
But I heard that Nikon didn't have a vibration mechanism to clear off particles for build reasons.
Rated 100% by by FrontPage (May, 2009)
The quality of images HAS suffered by Oskar Barnack's gadget, but the number of high quality images from what ever digital domain they escaped has made life communicating by pictures far more satisfying.
Rated 100% by by Cecil-Fox (Feb, 2008)
While the auto-focus system is an older design, it still works very well.
Rated 100% by by Dom-Miliano
Rated 87% by 23 users at amazon.com
In fact, when depth of field is important with wide angle shots, I'm finding the higher ISO settings are working extremely well.
Rated 100% by by T.-Cayton--photographer (Aug, 2012)
Canon's flagship doesn't disappoint here, I found images to have great color rendition and excellent resolution.
Rated 80% by by Barry-F.-Shaffer--Photogeek21 (Aug, 2012)
At 13x19 print size, you need to denoise a little, but they are still quite sharp at those ISOs.
Rated 100% by by Stephen-M.-Lerch (Aug, 2012)

sensor

And if you want to see just how bad D3 is at high ISO, use 50mm/1.4, 24-70mm/2.8 or another high quality lens, and those lenses will expose weaknesses of the sensor in terms of image quality.
Nikon D3 | Rated 60% by by Myra-C.-Mayo--Business-girl (Sep, 2009)
That said there is a huge $3000 price differential between them and so the D3 is more likely to be compared to the ten megapixel EOS-1D Mark III which has a 1.3x crop (29 x 19 mm) sensor.
Nikon D3 | by DPReview (Apr, 2008)
The EOS-1D Mark III and the D3 have little to choose between them at lower ISO settings, but once you get above ISO 800 the D3 pulls ahead thanks to its slightly lower pixel density.
Nikon D3 | by DPReview (Apr, 2008)

resolution

if you need 21 megapixels for your high end studio work you're going to buy an EOS-1Ds Mark III.
Nikon D3 | by DPReview (Apr, 2008)
You turn a D3 into a 5 megapixel camera.
Nikon D3 | Rated 20% by by Richard-Pissillo (Jul, 2008)
Lenses are labeled the same way and if you should choose to mount a DX lens on the D3 (something you can't do with Canon's sub-full-frame EF-S lenses on that company's 1D or 1Ds cameras), this Nikon can automatically adjust for the smaller circle of light shining onto the sensor and crop the image to 5 megapixels.
Nikon D3 | Rated 93% by by c|net (Jul, 2008)

size

Anyhow, the D3's 9-fps at full frame, impressive high ISO, and a wealth of other features on it were enough to lure me and my wallet back to the Nikon camp.
Nikon D3 | Rated 100% by by ThomasN (Jan, 2008)
As mentioned on the last page for the studio comparisons we've opted to put the D3 up against Canon's two full frame offerings, the EOS-1Ds Mark III and EOS 5D.
Nikon D3 | by DPReview (Apr, 2008)
For our studio comparisons we've stuck with full frame cameras and have included both Canon's top of the range models (the EOS-1Ds Mark III and EOS-1D Mark III) and for those wondering how much better the D3 is than baby brother, we've included the D300 too.
Nikon D3 | by DPReview (Apr, 2008)

iso

Even though D3 can take photos up to 25,000 ISO, they are not really usable.
Nikon D3 | Rated 60% by by Myra-C.-Mayo--Business-girl (Sep, 2009)
Of course, it's also about $3,000 more than the D3 and tops out at an equivalent of ISO 3,200.
Nikon D3 | Rated 93% by by c|net (Jul, 2008)
And it can't match the resolution of the EOS-1Ds Mark III at lower ISO settings, ruling it out for the most demanding studio photographers.
Nikon D3 | by DPReview (Apr, 2008)

photography

The EOS-1D Mark III is perhaps the camera most likely to be seen as a competitor for the D3 by sports photographers (it too is built for speed).
Nikon D3 | by DPReview (Apr, 2008)
Of course it's not all a bed of roses; the D3 is a lot pricier than the D2H ever was, and for many sports shooters it's a lot to ask for what is essentially a 5.1MP alternative to the EOS-1D Mk3 (if you shoot using the DX crop).
Nikon D3 | by DPReview (Apr, 2008)
However, beware of certain sellers like Wall Street Photo who have marked the D3 up to a ridiculous $9,999.00.
Nikon D3 | Rated 100% by by Matt (Mar, 2013)

Competition What else you should consider

Front view of Nikon D3 Front view of Canon EOS 1D X

New duel?

Let the battle continue or dare to compare.

Compare

Discussions Get involved, ask your question about the Nikon D3 and Canon EOS 1D X

Nikon
D3
Canon
1D X

Select aspects that are most important to you: (max 3)

Popular tags: