Compare with...

  • Sony Cybershot DSC-RX100
  • Pentax K-30
  • Fujifilm FinePix X100
  • Canon Powershot S100
  • Nikon 1 V1
$299
  • 10 MP
  • 3.8x f/2.0
  • 1/1.6" CCD
  • 3" LCD
Released July, 2010
Then you turn on the camera and the quality of the screen tells you that you are closer to feel very happy with your purchase until you take your first pictures.... And you are like... where is all the big improvement in picture quality?? Better zoom and better video YES.
Rated 80% by by Mr-Consumer
 
$504
  • 12 MP
  • 4x f/2.0
  • 2/3" CMOS
  • 2.8" LCD
Released September, 2011
But to get the best photo quality you have to shoot in the automatic modes, which runs counter to the idea of an enthusiast camera, and yet even in auto it's too complicated to recommend to snapshooters who just want better photo quality.
Rated 78% by by c|net (Dec, 2011)
 

Conclusion Which is better for you?

74%
72%
View Details
?
?
View Details
37%
45%
View Details
89%
82%
View Details

Winner

PanasonicLumix DMC-LX5

63
62

Features Key features of the Panasonic Lumix DMC-LX5 compared to the Fujifilm Finepix X10

MP10

1/1.6"

Back view of Panasonic Lumix DMC-LX5
The LX-5 is between the S and G in size, but it is a very different camera.24mm wide angle....longer zoom range than the S series.
Rated 100% by by James-P.-Garin (Feb, 2011)
Back view of Fujifilm Finepix X10

12 MP

2/3"

The output is distinctly low resolution, with image quality that is better suited for viewing on the web, rather than printing or pixel peeping.
Rated 76% by by DPReview (Jul, 2012)

megapixels

0 MP
12 MP

10 MP
20 MP
File size 4.4MB The level of detail is outstanding, even though the 90mm-equivalent focal length doesn't zoom in quite as far as most other compacts.
Lumix DMC-LX5 by TrustedReviews (May, 2011)
There still seems to be confusion about whether in RAW, or at least when in RAW, you are actually getting a 12 megapixel image or a 6 megapixel one.
Finepix X10 by Acoustica (Jan, 2012)

sensor size

Panasonic Lumix DMC-LX5
Fujifilm Finepix X10
Pictures are awesome and almost up there with quality with micro four thirds.
Lumix DMC-LX5 by Jaganath (Dec, 2011)
While the X10's AF system focusing speed is roughly on par with compact camera competitors like the Panasonic LX5, it lags behind the performance of the best contrast-detect systems we've seen, like those in the current crop of Micro Four Thirds cameras, for instance.
Finepix X10 by DPReview (Jul, 2012)

wide angle lens

Panasonic Lumix DMC-LX5
Fujifilm Finepix X10
Wide-angle is fantastic - After using Tamron 28-75 for so many years, I have found a whole new dimension in wide-angle photo-framing using LX5.
Lumix DMC-LX5 by Kebs (Jun, 2011)
Personally, I loved the smoother, less resistant original lens, but can only assume that Fuji bowed to the handful of whiners who complained that it was too easy to turn it off when rotating to the Wide Angle position.... really.
Finepix X10 by George-Sherwin

aperture size

Panasonic Lumix DMC-LX5
Fujifilm Finepix X10
Rather than posting more images showing how sharp the lens is (and it is a beautiful, fast lens), I'm intentionally uploading photos taken in low light-ISO up to 1600, handheld as slow as 1/4 second-with wedding photography, it's not just about razor sharpness (at least it wasn't with this couple-they loved the pictures).
Lumix DMC-LX5 by John-Cosenza
The good thing is that it is FAST f/2 to f/2.8-thats much better than most small P/S's and probably the MAIN REASON i bought this camera.
Finepix X10 by Tim-Kimzey--fstop (Sep, 2012)

zoom range

0x
4x

3.8x
4x
I love the 24mm f/2.8 Leica lens, the image stabilization, the RAW capability, the full manual control, and the multiple-screen formats.
Lumix DMC-LX5 by S.-Duford (Jan, 2011)
Bottom line is the X10 is better built, resolves detail better, is cleaner at higher ISO settings, manual zoom, focuses much faster, great skin tones and has a very good viewfinder.
Finepix X10 by MeridianX (Nov, 2011)

body size

110 x 66 x 43 mm
117 x 70 x 57 mm
These pro-compact cameras have the best overall design that offers the widest range of application, versatility, and user-friendliness.
Lumix DMC-LX5 by J.-Wang (Oct, 2010)
For anyone who is used to using an SLR, this is an excellent backup or small camera to carry when you do not want to carry a larger SLR.
Finepix X10 by georgehd--georgehd (Dec, 2011)
 

Performance Real world tests of Panasonic Lumix DMC-LX5 vs Fujifilm Finepix X10

battery life

400 photos
300 photos
It's much much faster (what's the point of having a camera if you miss the shot because the camera doesn't react in time), the low light ability is far superior, the macro is wonderful, it can zoom while recording video, and the battery life is excellent.
Lumix DMC-LX5 by Soured-Customer--Soured-Customer (Dec, 2010)
We don't really see the point of using the Continuous IS mode for either stills or video, particularly since it taxes the X10's already short battery life.
Finepix X10 by DPReview (Jul, 2012)

max continuous shooting

On the LX-5, I can only shoot 3 shots on a burst and then I have to wait until it finishes before I shoot again.
Lumix DMC-LX5 by rd-in-sf (Sep, 2010)
Its burst shooting sounds fast, but it's pretty limited: 7.5fps for one second.
Finepix X10 by c|net (Dec, 2011)

DxOMark low light performance

Panasonic Lumix DMC-LX5
Fujifilm Finepix X10
Applying a small amount of Noise Reduction in Lightroom brings the quality of low light pictures up quite easily.
Lumix DMC-LX5 by Defiant10k (Jun, 2011)
I am extremely impressed with the X10, the images are sharp even in low light without flash, colors are vibrant and with it's 2.0-2.8 lens, you can take multi shots very quickly.
Finepix X10 by Jay-Gatsby (Aug, 2012)
 

Differences What are the advantages of each

Advantages compared to the Fujifilm Finepix X10

Much larger screen 3" vs 2.8"
Around 10% larger screen
Wider lens 24 mm vs 28 mm
More than 10% wider focal length
Significantly more highly reviewed by consumers 89.43% vs 81.98%
Around 10% more highly reviewed by consumers
More photos per charge 400 vs 300
100 more shots; Longer battery life
Thinner 43 mm vs 57 mm
More than 20% thinner
Lighter 277 g vs 350 g
More than 20% lighter
Longer long exposure 60 s vs 30 s
2x longer long exposure; Capture creative photos such as night sky movement
Smaller 110 x 66 x 43 mm vs 117 x 70 x 57 mm
More than 30% smaller

Advantages compared to the Panasonic Lumix DMC-LX5

Significantly higher definition video HD video vs HD video
Great video; great for displaying on a large flat panel TV
Has a viewfinder Gives you more flexibility when framing your shot vs Allows for less stability when taking a photo
Most cameras don't have a viewfinder; Avoids glare in bright sunlight
Better overall image quality 50.0 vs 41.0
More than 20% better image quality
Significantly more contrast-detection focus points 49 vs 23
26 more contrast detection focus points; Better autofocus in low light settings
Faster rapid fire 10 fps vs 6 fps
Around 70% faster continuous shooting; Take photos in rapid succession to capture motion
Shoots high speed video Yes vs No
Somewhat common; Create slow motion video
Marginally more recently announced Sep, 2011 vs Jul, 2010
Announced date over 1 years later
Supports HDR Yes vs No
Somewhat common; Combines multiple photos together to capture both bright and dark areas
Automatic panorama Yes vs No
Somewhat common; Stitches together multiple photos into a single ultra-wide view
More color depth 20.5 bits vs 19.6 bits
Almost the same
Higher resolution 12 MP vs 10 MP
More than 20% higher resolution; Capture more detail, good for large prints
Better dynamic range 11.3 ev vs 10.8 ev
Almost the same

Reviews Word on the street

Panasonic Lumix DMC-LX5

Fujifilm Finepix X10

Rated 90%
Read the review (Sep, 2010)
Fast forward two years to 2010, and it's the turn of the new LX5 to appeal to the more experienced prosumer, with a longer 3.8x lens, improved 10 megapixel sensor, AVCHD movies and a tweaked control system all on offer.
Rated 90%
Read the review (Nov, 2011)
The Fujifilm Finepix X10 takes the compact camera to the next level, with a luxurious and intuitive design, class-leading build quality, quick responses and enough features to satisfy most photographers.
Rated 90%
Read the review (May, 2011)
The LX5 has a new lens with 3.8x zoom, equivalent to 24-90mm, but this hasn't meant sacrificing the fast maximum aperture, which is now.
Rated 90%
Read the review (Dec, 2011)
Tonality is another area where the X10 delivers pleasing results with good levels of contrast, even with all tonal settings set to ‘Standard.
Rated 88% by 378 users at amazon.com
the larger size is more than offset by the great viewfinder and fully articulating screen.
Rated 60% by by S.-R.-Kimball (Feb, 2011)
It's too thick to fit into a pocket, but with the neck strap, it's still very easy to carry around.
Rated 100% by by L.-Debiasi (Dec, 2011)
It also shoots surprisingly good HD video!
Rated 100% by by S.-Duford (Jan, 2011)
Rated 74% by 110 users at amazon.com
If I were Fujifilm, I'd gut the damn thing and put inside a simpler IQ, a better sensor and battery, and I'd make damn sure the lens is dust-proof.
Rated 20% by by jmf (Dec, 2011)
Con: Zooming is a two handed operation one to hold the camera and the other to zoom.
Rated 80% by by Richard-P.-Barteldt (Aug, 2012)
The built in lens is very fast, F2 at 28mm and F2.8 at 112mm.
Rated 100% by by yakarb (Dec, 2011)

lens

My reasons for buying this camera are as follows; I wanted a pocket-friendly camera to use as my main camera (not just a second camera) with good low-light capability, a wide angle lens and the auto focus and optical zoom in the HD video mode, The LX5 with the large sensor (large for a pocket-friendly camera), the fast f/2 lens (at the wide angle setting), and the excellent image stabilization meets my requirements.
Panasonic Lumix DMC-LX5 | Rated 100% by by Lowell (Dec, 2010)
Although I liked the pocket ability of the S95, I chose the LX5 because of the excellent build quality, wide angle bright Leica lens and the optical zoom.
Panasonic Lumix DMC-LX5 | Rated 100% by by Sameh-Abdulrhim (Dec, 2011)
Zoom function is OK but it would be nice if zoom could be more than the 3,8 times - again Panasonic makes x10 zoom in cheaper models.
Panasonic Lumix DMC-LX5 | Rated 80% by by Erik (Feb, 2011)

sensor

Now, do NOT expect this to have the same performance as a DSLR or even a Four Thirds camera, because the LX5 still uses a compact, 1/1.63" CCD sensor, which cannot match the light and color sensitivity of a DSLR sensor that is larger - the LX5's sensor is about 45 mm^2 in area whereas a Four Thirds sensor is 225 mm^2 in area and, say, the Nikon APS-C sensor in DSLR's from Nikon, Pentax and Sony measure 370 mm^2 in area.
Panasonic Lumix DMC-LX5 | Rated 100% by by Gadgester--No-Time--No-Money (Dec, 2011)
f/8..Especially on the edges...While the DSLR may still have a stronger signal/noise ratio because of the larger pixels, it's the pixel pitch of the LX5 sensor that tips the scales in it's favor for resolution...Panasonic has really improved their noise alogrithyms as in most cases I'm not afraid to shoot at ISO 1600 for prints up to 11x14"...The shutter lag is non existent and even in Raw/jpg with the review off you can shoot one shot after another with approx.
Panasonic Lumix DMC-LX5 | Rated 100% by by kandoro (Apr, 2011)
That being said, the Panasonic can be tweaked to produce decent jpegs, especially at lower iso settings, and after buying the LX5 and its LVF 1 eyelevel viewfinder for $550 here at Amazon, I still had $250 of the $800 I would have paid for the Leica to buy the $299 Adobe Lightroom software included with the latter.
Panasonic Lumix DMC-LX5 | Rated 80% by by aethelraed (Dec, 2010)

zoom

As a Canon user, I immediately found the LX5 controls to be fully intuitive, although I must admit I'm still learning ALL of the menu controls as I crave manual control and creative flexibility!
Panasonic Lumix DMC-LX5 | Rated 100% by by David-J.-Peebler--DJPeebz (Nov, 2010)
I got the LX5 because I am traveling extensively and wanted something versatile, a camera that could be completely automatic, or totally manual, compact, flash, good zoom (90 mm), and fast shutter speed.
Panasonic Lumix DMC-LX5 | Rated 100% by by Kiwi (Oct, 2010)
I thought I would miss the 12x zoom of the ZS1 but the LX5's 3.8x zoom seems to be adequate and I haven't missed the 12x zoom of the ZS1.
Panasonic Lumix DMC-LX5 | Rated 80% by by hiker (Feb, 2011)

size

A year later this Lumix LX5 seems to me to be much more camera, at about 1/4 the price and 1/4 the size and weight as the Sony DSLR I was going to buy.
Panasonic Lumix DMC-LX5 | Rated 100% by by Robert-Speziale--bob_spez (Apr, 2012)
Panasonic Lumix DMC-LX5 camera - ReviewOn trips, there have been times when I've left my SLR camera at home because of its weight and size.
Panasonic Lumix DMC-LX5 | Rated 100% by by L.-Farwell (Jan, 2011)
The Panasonic Lumix DMC-LX5 is the long-awaited successor to the ahead-of-its-time LX3, a compact camera that hit the sweet spot for photographers looking for a pocketable alternative to their DSLR.
Panasonic Lumix DMC-LX5 | Rated 90% by by Photography Blog (Sep, 2010)

quality

Because the super sharp lens and better signal/noise ratio with the larger sensor the 720P video from the LX5 is actually superior to the 1080i video from my FZ100.
Panasonic Lumix DMC-LX5 | Rated 100% by by kandoro (Apr, 2011)
Very nice finishing, the Lumix LX5 takes way better pictures than my Canon S90, and the video quality is surprisingly clear.
Panasonic Lumix DMC-LX5 | Rated 100% by by Saab-93--Saab-93 (Dec, 2010)
I had returned the LX5 because I wanted a smaller camera with top of the line video quality, but after going through many P&S over the course of 2011: Canon S95, S100, 300HS, 100HS, Sony HX9V, Olympus XZ-1, Fujifilm XP20, W3 - I realized the error of my ways.
Panasonic Lumix DMC-LX5 | Rated 80% by by Jeff-Aski

Discussions Get involved, ask your question about the Panasonic Lumix DMC-LX5 and Fujifilm Finepix X10

Panasonic
DMC-LX5
Fujifilm
X10

Select aspects that are most important to you: (max 3)

Popular tags: