Compare with...

  • Sony NEX-5N
  • Canon Powershot S100
  • Fujifilm FinePix X100
  • Canon PowerShot G15
  • Panasonic Lumix DMC-LX3
$320
  • 10 MP
  • 3.8x f/2.0
  • 1/1.6" CCD
  • 3" LCD
Released July, 2010
It's much much faster (what's the point of having a camera if you miss the shot because the camera doesn't react in time), the low light ability is far superior, the macro is wonderful, it can zoom while recording video, and the battery life is excellent.
Rated 60% by by Soured-Customer--Soured-Customer (Dec, 2010)
 
$234
  • 15.8 MP
  • Four Thirds CMOS
  • 3" LCD
Released November, 2011
The abundance of external control points along with a responsive and intuitive touchscreen interface make the GX1 a very pleasant camera to use, whether you are changing exposure settings between shots or tweaking menu options to tailor the camera's behavior to your liking.
Rated 77% by by DPReview (Feb, 2012)
 

Conclusion Which is better for you?

74%
60%
View Details
?
?
View Details
64%
70%
View Details
89%
84%
View Details

Winner

PanasonicLumix DMC-LX5

69
68

Features Key features of the Panasonic Lumix DMC-LX5 compared to the DMC-GX1

MP10

1/1.6"

Back view of Panasonic Lumix DMC-LX5
My bottom line advice is your personal priorities will determine which camera fits you best but please still consider the whole package: size, weight, ergonomics, menu system, AF lag times, RAW write times, battery life, possible accessories, etc..
Rated 100% by by I.-Pribadi (Oct, 2010)
Angle view of Panasonic Lumix DMC-GX1

15.8 MP

Four Thirds

The build quality of the GX1 is defined by a pleasingly substantial heft that balances nicely with a range of Micro Four Thirds zoom lenses.
Rated 77% by by DPReview (Feb, 2012)

megapixels

0 MP
15.8 MP

10 MP
20 MP
The level of detail is outstanding, even though the 90mm-equivalent focal length doesn't zoom in quite as far as most other compacts.
Lumix DMC-LX5 by TrustedReviews (May, 2011)
Upgraded internals: The sensor density has been increased by 33 percent to 16 megapixels from 12 megapixels of the older MFT cameras.
Lumix DMC-GX1 by A.-Hasija (Jun, 2012)

sensor size

Panasonic Lumix DMC-LX5
Panasonic Lumix DMC-GX1
Pictures are awesome and almost up there with quality with micro four thirds.
Lumix DMC-LX5 by Jaganath (Dec, 2011)
Although the GX1 has slightly smaller dimensions in both width and depth, it's worth remembering that that Sony has managed to pack a built-in EVF, articulating LCD and of course an APS-C sensor into the NEX-7.
Lumix DMC-GX1 by DPReview (Feb, 2012)

body size

110 x 66 x 43 mm
116 x 68 x 39 mm
These pro-compact cameras have the best overall design that offers the widest range of application, versatility, and user-friendliness.
Lumix DMC-LX5 by J.-Wang (Oct, 2010)
The overall size and weight are just perfect for me.
Lumix DMC-GX1 by Sam-Lee (Dec, 2011)

focus points

0
23

23
30
The lens is great - is easy to throw the background out of focus and have sharp focus on the subject, giving pictures the depth I used to get with my film SLR.
Lumix DMC-LX5 by Bird (Feb, 2011)
The touch screen is pretty nice as well, allowing you to choose focus points, and the custom controls I definitely made use of.
Lumix DMC-GX1 by Chatoyer (Feb, 2013)
 

Performance Real world tests of Panasonic Lumix DMC-LX5 vs DMC-GX1

shutter lag

Panasonic Lumix DMC-LX5
Panasonic Lumix DMC-GX1
The response time is excellent.
Lumix DMC-LX5 by Steve-N (Apr, 2011)
The Panasonic Lumix DMC-GX1 maximum shutter speed is 60 seconds and there's also a Bulb option for exposures up to 4 minutes long, which is excellent news if you're seriously interested in night photography.
Lumix DMC-GX1 by Photography Blog (Jan, 2012)

battery life

400 photos
310 photos
0 !!. - Battery life is fantastic.
Lumix DMC-LX5 by N.-Chawla--neerajc
The NP-FW50 has 7.7Wh of energy, promises 360 shots per charge using the CIPA standard, which puts it top amongst mirrorless ILCs.
Lumix DMC-GX1 by DPReview (Mar, 2013)

max continuous shooting

On the LX-5, I can only shoot 3 shots on a burst and then I have to wait until it finishes before I shoot again.
Lumix DMC-LX5 by rd-in-sf (Sep, 2010)
We shot ten burst sequences of an approaching bicycle (with a rather busy background behind him), and the NEX was able to track the subject about 70% of the time.
Lumix DMC-GX1 by DPReview (Mar, 2013)

DxOMark low light performance

Panasonic Lumix DMC-LX5
Panasonic Lumix DMC-GX1
Pictures are crisp, it takes good photos in low light and has plenty of manual settings.
Lumix DMC-LX5 by Cam (Apr, 2012)
Great low light performance: Speaking from personal experience here, I have found this camera to be 10 times better in low light performance.
Lumix DMC-GX1 by A.-Hasija (Jun, 2012)

DxOMark image quality

Panasonic Lumix DMC-LX5
Panasonic Lumix DMC-GX1
The main thing to love about the camera is the image quality for the fairly small size.
Lumix DMC-LX5 by Scott-Fisher (Dec, 2011)
Overall image quality is fantastic and certainly on a par with the G3, with the GX1 being able to produce images full of bright, vibrant colours, pleasing tonality and contrast, sharp edges and good levels of detail.
Lumix DMC-GX1 by TrustedReviews (Jan, 2012)
 

Differences What are the advantages of each

Advantages compared to the DMC-GX1

Image stabilization Optical vs None
Supports image stabilization
More highly reviewed by consumers 89.43% vs 84.16%
More than 5% more highly reviewed by consumers
More photos per charge 400 vs 310
90 more shots; Longer battery life

Advantages compared to the DMC-LX5

Larger sensor Four Thirds vs 1/1.6"
More than 4.2x larger sensor; higher quality photos
Has a touch screen Yes vs No
Somewhat common; Fewer buttons, interact directly with menus
Better overall image quality 55.0 vs 41.0
Around 35% better image quality
Interchangeable lenses Yes vs No
Somewhat common; Use a variety of specialized lenses
Significantly higher definition video HD video vs HD video
Great video; great for displaying on a large flat panel TV
Create realistic 3D images Yes vs No
Somewhat common; Create 3D photos to view on a 3D TV
Significantly higher resolution 15.8 MP vs 10 MP
Around 60% higher resolution; Capture more detail, good for large prints
Less startup delay 1,400 ms vs 2,300 ms
Around 40% less startup delay; Be ready for anything
Supports HDR Yes vs No
Somewhat common; Combines multiple photos together to capture both bright and dark areas
Less noise at high ISO 703 ISO vs 132 ISO
More than 5.2x higher low light performance
More color depth 20.8 bits vs 19.6 bits
More than 5% more color depth
Marginally more recently announced Nov, 2011 vs Jul, 2010
Announced date over 1 years later
Self cleaning sensor Yes vs No
Somewhat common; Prevents dust showing up in your photos

Reviews Word on the street

Panasonic Lumix DMC-LX5

Panasonic Lumix DMC-GX1

Rated 90%
Read the review (May, 2011)
The LX5 has a new lens with 3.8x zoom, equivalent to 24-90mm, but this hasn't meant sacrificing the fast maximum aperture, which is now f/2 – f/3..
Rated 90%
Read the review (Jan, 2012)
Working in tandem with the touch-screen the GX1 offers the same the same intuitive Touch AF and Touch Shutter features seen on other Lumix G-series models.
Rated 90%
Read the review (Sep, 2010)
[4:3]VGA: 640 x 480 pixels, 30fps (Motion JPEG) / QVGA: 320 x 240 pixels, 30 fps (Motion JPEG) / [16:9]WVGA: 848 x 480 pixels, 30 fps (Motion JPEG) / [HD Movie]1280x720 pixels, / NTSC Mode: NTSC model: 60p(CCD output is 30p) / PAL model: 50p(CCD output is 25p) / (AVCHD Lite, SH: 17Mbps / H:13Mbps / L:9Mbps ) / 30fps (Motion JPEG).
Rated 90%
Read the review (Jan, 2012)
We'd still just give the edge to the G3 thanks to its built-in EVF and rotating LCD screen, and the Sony NEX-7 that we're also reviewing soon is definitely a very big rival, but if you want virtually all of Panasonic's compact system camera technologies in a small, customisable and intuitive package, the new Lumix DMC-GX1 fits the bill almost perfectly.
Rated 88% by 378 users at amazon.com
The F2.0 Leica lens is outstanding for resolution and color clarity - I've done enlargements to poster size and still haven't reached the limits of the lens/camera combo.
Rated 100% by by D.-Eilenberger (Jan, 2011)
With the factory settings, camera just turned on, the pic was bright, detailed and amazingly sharp.
Rated 100% by by R.-Wallace (Dec, 2011)
I am a rare bird in that I did not want a tiny camera to stuff in my pocket, I like to hold a sturdy, solid camera and this is it.
Rated 100% by by Matthew (Dec, 2011)
Rated 86% by 91 users at amazon.com
The combination of size, good looks, image quality and overall convenience is hard to beat at the moment.
Rated 100% by by Abe--Photo-Dude (Jun, 2012)
Overall build quality is excellent.
Rated 100% by by Sam-Lee (Dec, 2011)
The build quality is really nice.
Rated 20% by by Danny-J.-Page--Danny-J-Page

lens

My reasons for buying this camera are as follows; I wanted a pocket-friendly camera to use as my main camera (not just a second camera) with good low-light capability, a wide angle lens and the auto focus and optical zoom in the HD video mode, The LX5 with the large sensor (large for a pocket-friendly camera), the fast f/2 lens (at the wide angle setting), and the excellent image stabilization meets my requirements.
Panasonic Lumix DMC-LX5 | Rated 100% by by Lowell (Dec, 2010)
Although I liked the pocket ability of the S95, I chose the LX5 because of the excellent build quality, wide angle bright Leica lens and the optical zoom.
Panasonic Lumix DMC-LX5 | Rated 100% by by Sameh-Abdulrhim (Dec, 2011)
Wide-angle is fantastic - After using Tamron 28-75 for so many years, I have found a whole new dimension in wide-angle photo-framing using LX5.
Panasonic Lumix DMC-LX5 | Rated 100% by by Kebs (Jun, 2011)

image quality

The Panasonic Lumix DMC-LX5's maximum shutter speed is 60 seconds in Manual shooting mode and the Starry Sky Mode scene mode, which is great news if you're seriously interested in night photography.
Panasonic Lumix DMC-LX5 | Rated 90% by by Photography Blog (Sep, 2010)
The LX5 seems to have much more accurate color.
Panasonic Lumix DMC-LX5 | Rated 80% by by Radio-Man--yarns13
Low light performance is a little less impressive, but the LX5 just produces more crisp images with better colors IMO.
Panasonic Lumix DMC-LX5 | Rated 100% by by Mic-Masterson--Mic (Sep, 2010)

controls

The pictures from the LX5 are excellent and it has all the same controls that my big SLR has.
Panasonic Lumix DMC-LX5 | Rated 100% by by L.-Farwell (Jan, 2011)
The LX5 delivers really nice images and the controls are well thought out and easy to learn.
Panasonic Lumix DMC-LX5 | Rated 80% by by T.-Skoglund (Oct, 2010)
The LX5 is a good compromise for me, mostly mechanical buttons and switches clearly marked so I can operate them without glasses - my last two Panasonic point and shoots were more pocketable but this led to casual handling and subsequent droppage and cracked LCDs.
Panasonic Lumix DMC-LX5 | Rated 100% by by Design49er (Jun, 2011)

ergonomics

GX1 is very similar to LX5 in many respects such as overall body size, buttons layout, picture quality, and menu system.
Panasonic Lumix DMC-GX1 | Rated 100% by by Sam-Lee (Dec, 2011)
Also, the excellent and intuitive control layout of the GX1 has mostly been preserved (unlike the later GF models which now seem to be aimed more at the point and shoot audience and rely far more on their touchscreen controls).
Panasonic Lumix DMC-GX1 | Rated 100% by by Daniel-Grant (Dec, 2012)

Discussions Get involved, ask your question about the Panasonic Lumix DMC-LX5 and DMC-GX1

Panasonic
DMC-LX5
Panasonic
DMC-GX1

Select aspects that are most important to you: (max 3)

Popular tags: