At wide angles the pictures a pretty sharp, but I really wonder why we are given 14 megapixels, whereas 10 megapixels would probably give you just as good an image, with smaller files.

The quality of the photos is slightly lower than that of top-of-the-line 2.1 megapixel cameras (e.g., the PowerShot S10.

You can only view the results on a 3D TV (the TZ20 records standard MPO files), and although it isn't as effective as images taken with Panasonic's 3D Micro Four Thirds lens or the Fujifilm 3D W3, for example, it does create quite a convincing effect which particularly suits subjects that are close-up to the camera.

First off, I don't think it's fair to compare the s100 to DSLRs, APS-C, Four Thirds cameras.

The zoom is excellent as well as the wide angle length.

* 24mm wide-angle is very useful for indoor photography.

My husband and I both shoot with DSLRs and are accustomed to having the ability to control how an image is taken (aperture or shutter priority, manual, etc).

The function ring around the lens is a particularly effective control point, offering quick access to controls like shutter speed, aperture and ISO.

The ZS10 is nice for most pictures and video: faster, longer zoom, larger dispay and fits in a pocket.

Now if you are someone that wants pant pocketable camera with excellent manual controls and image quality, the s100 is very hard to beat.

The size of the camera seems perfect in my hands, not too small and but just the right size that it feels comfortable and secure in my hands.

If you're a graphics artist, you will probably want a 3megapixel camera, but for the average user, this small camera will get used more due to it's size and takes great photos.