- Conclusion Get the lowdown
- Features How they compare
- Performance Real world benchmarks
- Differences Technical showdown
- Reviews Word on the street
- Competition Others to consider
- Discussion Answers and opinions
Compare with...
- Sony NEX-5N
- Nikon D5100
- Nikon D3100
- Nikon 1 J1
- Nikon 1 J2
Rated 74% by by DPReview (Aug, 2012)While AVCHD movies look great on your HDTV, editing and sharing them isn't so easy.
- 16 MP
- APS-C CMOS
- 3" LCD
Rated 100% by by Karen-D (Apr, 2012)this little camera is great, about half the size of the d40 much easier to manage.
Conclusion Which is better for you?
Features Key features of the Sony NEX-F3 compared to the Sony NEX C3
MP16
APS-C
Rated 74% by by DPReview (Aug, 2012)Thankfully, Sony also supports the MPEG-4 codec, which is much easier to work with.
megapixels
| 0 MP | 16 MP | 20 MP |
NEX-F3 by c|net (May, 2012)After it crops the photo, Sony feels compelled to unnecessarily bloat it back up to 16 megapixels.
NEX C3 by Yano (Sep, 2012)This camera ironically features one of the best 16MP APS sensors ever made, better than the ones put in Sony's other 16MP APS cameras and Nikon's 16MP cameras (All Nikon DSLR sensors are made by Sony).
sensor size
NEX-F3 by David-Pierce (Jun, 2012)That the Sony NEX-F3 has an updated 16.1-megapixel APS-C sensor isn't as important as it once was, but it still means the camera's capable of shooting better, more versatile pictures than a point-and-shoot.
body size
117 x 67 x 42 mm
110 x 60 x 33 mm
NEX-F3 by David-Pierce (Jun, 2012)Since most cameras have gray-on-gray, text-heavy menu systems, Sony's colorful icon-based interface is a definite breath of fresh air, though I'm not sure it works better in practice than the more boring options.
NEX C3 by M.-Kearl (Aug, 2011)The weight and main bulk of the camera is the 18-55mm lens that comes with it, and not the camera body.
focus points
| 0 | 25 | 30 |
NEX-F3 by DPReview (Aug, 2012)You'll have stereo sound, continuous autofocus, and use of the image stabilizer if your lens has one.
NEX C3 by M.-Li (Apr, 2012)It's also turned me into an amateur photographer, as I read up on f stops and manual focusing in order to fully exploit the capabilities of this camera.
Performance Real world tests of Sony NEX-F3 vs Sony NEX C3
DxOMark image quality
NEX-F3 by c|net (May, 2012)With a streamlined interface, small - but not too small - bodies, solid performance, and very good photo quality for a modest price, the consumer NEX models don't excel in any particular aspect but deliver a nice, well-rounded package for people searching for something better than a point-and shoot.
NEX C3 by Sarge (Dec, 2011)Has a full size processor similar to a DSLR in a 4/5 camera so picture quality is excellent.
DxOMark low light performance
NEX-F3 by DPReview (Aug, 2012)Colors were nice and saturated in most cases, with the only real exception being in our night tests, where there was a nasty brown color cast.
NEX C3 by SunnySideUp (Sep, 2011)The pictures are amazing, even in low light colors are great, pictures are super sharp and the continues shooting allows us to capture every smile and new movement with clear sharp images.
shutter lag
| 0 ms | 314 ms | 400 ms |
NEX-F3 by David-Pierce (Jun, 2012)There's virtually no shutter lag, as long as you half-press to focus before you try to snap a picture.
NEX C3 by appstatephotographer (Sep, 2012)There really isn't much that I don't like about this camera, other than the fact that I wish it had a remote shutter release.
continuous shooting
NEX C3 by Jason (Dec, 2012)The continuous shooting feature works great, and the stock 18-55 lens takes amazing pictures.
battery life
470 photos
400 photos
NEX-F3 by DPReview (Aug, 2012)While battery life is excellent, the camera's internal charging system is very slow, and prevents you from charging a spare (you'll need to buy an external charger for that).
NEX C3 by Derrick (Aug, 2011)On the first full charge I took almost 400 jpeg+raw pictures, a couple panoramas and a video, along with plenty of reviewing of pictures on the LCD and still had 18% battery life left.
Differences What are the advantages of each
Advantages compared to the NEX C3
| Much higher definition video | HD video | vs | HD video |
|---|---|---|---|
| Great video; great for displaying on a large flat panel TV | |||
| Has a built-in flash | Built in flash | vs | None |
| About half of cameras have a built-in flash; Take photos in low-light with no extra gear | |||
| Shoots video in 24p | Yes | vs | No |
| Somewhat common; For that film look | |||
| More photos per charge | 470 | vs | 400 |
| 70 more shots; Longer battery life | |||
| Marginally more recently announced | May, 2012 | vs | Jun, 2011 |
| Announced date 11 months later | |||
| Higher light sensitivity | 16,000 ISO | vs | 12,800 ISO |
| Around 30% higher light sensitivity; Avoid blur in low light situations | |||
Advantages compared to the NEX-F3
| Much more highly reviewed by consumers | 92.49% | vs | 80.16% |
|---|---|---|---|
| Around 20% more highly reviewed by consumers | |||
| Less startup delay | 1,200 ms | vs | 1,500 ms |
| 20% less startup delay; Be ready for anything | |||
| Thinner | 33 mm | vs | 42 mm |
| More than 20% thinner | |||
| Lighter | 225 g | vs | 314 g |
| Around 30% lighter | |||
| Smaller | 110 x 60 x 33 mm | vs | 117 x 67 x 42 mm |
| More than 30% smaller | |||
Reviews Word on the street
Sony NEX-F3 | Sony NEX C3 | ||
![]() | Rated 100% by by Ron-G. (Jan, 2013) Rated 100% by by Chuckie-Wuckie (Oct, 2012) Rated 100% by by Loraine-Easterling (Mar, 2013) | Rated 80% by by Ali-Julia (Aug, 2011) Rated 100% by by Informed-Buyer (Aug, 2011) Rated 100% by by Informed-Buyer (Aug, 2011) | |
|---|---|---|---|
screen
Sony Alpha NEX-F3 | Rated 72% by by David-Pierce (Jun, 2012)It's the same price as the C3 — $599.99 with an 18-55mm kit lens — but it offers some nice upgrades over last year's model: it records 1080p video, has a great tilting LCD that even lets you shoot self-portraits, and has upgraded internals that should make the 16-megapixel shooter faster and better than ever.
Sony Alpha NEX-F3 | Rated 90% by by Photography Blog (Jul, 2012)We wish that the LCD screen could be tilted sideways as well as up and down, the user interface was a little more intuitive and quicker to use, and the price a bit lower, but otherwise the diminutive NEX-F3 proves to be a versatile camera that is capable of taking excellent photos and video.
Sony Alpha NEX-F3 | Rated 90% by by Photography Blog (Jul, 2012)The Sony NEX-F3 significantly improves on its predecessor with a more versatile 180 degree tilting screen, fully integrated pop-up flash and 1080 50i/25p HD video recording.
sensor
Sony Alpha NEX-F3 | Rated 74% by by DPReview (Aug, 2012)Naturally, the NEX-F3 supports the RAW image format, as well.
Sony Alpha NEX-F3 | Rated 74% by by DPReview (Aug, 2012)In RAW mode the F3 doesn't deliver much more 'true' detail but moiré patterning is very apparent from around 2800 lp/ph..
Sony Alpha NEX-F3 | Rated 78% by by c|net (May, 2012)The F3's photos generally look very good, though I wish raw file support were available, because I suspect the F3's raw photos at ISO 400 look a lot better.
flips out
Sony Alpha NEX-F3 | Rated 72% by by David-Pierce (Jun, 2012)The LCD also tilts up 180 degrees and down a bit as well, a nice improvement over the C3.
Sony Alpha NEX-F3 | Rated 78% by by c|net (May, 2012)The tilting LCD is the same as on the C3, but Sony has added a new twist: you can flip it straight up for self-portraits, and when it's in that position it automatically goes into self-timer mode, with a countdown display appearing on the LCD.
Sony Alpha NEX-F3 | Rated 74% by by DPReview (Aug, 2012)Although not fully articulated, the fold-out-and-up design allows for considerable versatility when framing, although something I don't like about the new display is that you can only tilt it downward by 13 degrees, as opposed to 45 degrees on the NEX-C3.
video
Sony Alpha NEX-F3 | Rated 72% by by David-Pierce (Jun, 2012)It's also worth mentioning that the NEX-C3 is still a great camera, and can likely be found for considerably less than $599.99 now that the F3 is out — if you can do without 1080p video and the awesome flash, it might be a better option.
Sony Alpha NEX-F3 | Rated 72% by by David-Pierce (Jun, 2012)The F3 shoots 1080p video at 24 frames per second, a big upgrade over the 720p capabilities of the C3 — though oddly you can't shoot 720p video on the F3 anymore, so if you'd rather shoot 720p30 and get smaller sizes and higher fps, you're stuck with the C3.
Sony Alpha NEX-F3 | Rated 74% by by DPReview (Aug, 2012)The last feature I wish to mention is the NEX-F3's movie mode, which records Full HD video at either 24p or 60i.
lens
Sony Alpha NEX-F3 | Rated 72% by by David-Pierce (Jun, 2012)Photos are impressively sharp throughout the image, even with the kit lens — a lot of cameras and kit lenses produce images that get softer as you move toward the corners, but the NEX-C3 is nicely uniform in that regard.
Sony Alpha NEX-F3 | Rated 74% by by DPReview (Aug, 2012)The NEX-F3 has a regular digital zoom feature, and if you lower the resolution, you can use it without any drop in quality.
Sony Alpha NEX-F3 | Rated 90% by by Photography Blog (Jul, 2012)The Sony NEX-F3 is available now in silver or black with an 18-55mm standard zoom lens for about $600 / £530.
Competition What else you should consider
| | 1 | Sony NEX-5N Sensor with the most color depth |
| | 2 | Nikon D5100 Best image quality as rated by DXOMark |
| | 3 | Nikon D3100 Fastest to start up |
| | 4 | Nikon 1 J1 2-way tie: Fastest rapid fire mode |
| | 5 | Nikon 1 J2 Many many cross-type focus points |
| | 6 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-GF3 2-way tie: Long long exposure |
| | 7 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-GF5 2-way tie: Long long exposure |
| | 8 | Samsung NX1000 Largest sensor |
Unanswered Questions
- 1 discussions
- View more
Studying Abroad?
I plan to study abroad in Copenhagen, Denmark next year be a student blogger. The pictures I'm most likely to take are candids, self-portraits, low-light situations. What do you suggest? I'm I...







