- Conclusion Get the lowdown
- Features How they compare
- Performance Real world benchmarks
- Differences Technical showdown
- Reviews Word on the street
- Competition Others to consider
- Discussion Answers and opinions
Compare with...
- HTC One X
- Sony Xperia Z
- Sony Xperia P
- Huawei Ascend G300
- LG Esteem
- Android 1.5 Cupcake
- 3.5G
- 3.2"
- 0.53 GHz
Rated 77% by by c|net (Sep, 2009)It's also quite compact at 4.46 inches tall by 2.2 inches wide by 0.54 inch thick and weighs 4.5 ounces.
- Android 4.0 Ice Cream Sandwich
- 4G
- 4.3"
- Dual core 1.2 GHz
Rated 100% by by Scott (Jul, 2011)I use this phone all the time for internet browsing and the built-in internet browser is fast.
Conclusion Which is better for you?
Features Key features of the HTC Hero compared to the HTC EVO 3D
GHz0.53
Android 1.5 Cupcake 3.5G
by GSM Arena (Aug, 2009)The weight of 135 g is perhaps a notch above the class average but grants an extra solid feel in hand.
1.2 GHz
Android 4.0 Ice Cream Sandwich 4G
Rated 100% by by A.-Haq (Jul, 2011)This phone is unbelievably fast - I multitask a lot, so I'll have many apps open, browsers open, take pictures, etc. etc. and the the system barely ever slows down.
screen size
3.2"
4.3"
EVO 3D by GSM Arena (Aug, 2011)the 4.3” screen has enough real estate for big, well-spaced keys, which are easy to hit.
screen resolution
Hero by GSM Arena (Aug, 2009)There you can set the metering mode, sharpness, saturation and contrast of the photos and you can add a viewfinder gridline to assist your framing.
EVO 3D by Kenneth-E.-Rathburn (Dec, 2011)Brightness can get quite high, color is in high quality regardless of the source, and the resolution helps make details easy to see.
memory
| 0 GB | 1 GB | 1 GB |
processor
EVO 3D by Thomas-Andrejko--BOWHUNTER (Jul, 2011)and the first time i played around with this phone i was blown away!! first off the specs are amazing, dual-core 1.2ghz snapdragon, 4.3in qhd screen, gryoscope, proxmity sensor, adreno 220 gpu.
camera resolution
| 0 MP | 5 MP | 5 MP |
Hero by GSM Arena (Aug, 2009)HTC Hero is equipped with a 5 megapixel autofocus camera for a maximum image resolution of 2560 x 1920 pixels.
EVO 3D by c|net (Jun, 2011)The Evo 3D's 5-megapixel camera delivered excellent 2D picture quality; 3D photos were another story.
Performance Real world tests of HTC Hero vs HTC EVO 3D
cpu speed
Hero by Igor-MolochevskiOne of the major factors for me was the screen and the other one was the build and processor speed.
browser benchmark
EVO 3D by GSM Arena (Aug, 2011)Now, HTC has put a custom Flash player (as they usually do) in the browser but that can't be it - SunSpider is pure JavaScript.
download speed
Hero by TrustedReviews (May, 2011)There's HSDPA support for download speeds of up to 7.2Mbit/s on the 900 and 2100Mhz bands and you also get quad-band GSM support with GPRS and EDGE for when you're out of the range of a 3G signal.
talk time
469 min
360 min
Hero by Rodney-Beede (Dec, 2011)Talk time I still get 2 hours even after having the phone for 2 years.
EVO 3D by c|net (Jun, 2011)As soon as we complete testing, we will update this section with our battery talk time results.
Differences What are the advantages of each
Advantages compared to the EVO 3D GSM, WiMAX
| Significantly lighter | 135 g | vs | 170 g |
|---|---|---|---|
| More than 20% lighter | |||
| Smaller | 56 x 112 x 14 mm | vs | 66 x 127 x 12 mm |
| Around 10% smaller | |||
| Longer talk time | 469 min | vs | 360 min |
| More than 30% longer talk time; go days without charging | |||
Advantages compared to the Hero GSM
| Supports Adobe Flash | Yes | vs | No (Android) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Somewhat common; Many games and videos on the Internet require Adobe Flash | |||
| Much lower network latency | 88 ms | vs | 735 ms |
| 8.4x lower network latency | |||
| Much better browser benchmark | 1,458 ms | vs | 4,362 ms |
| 3x better browser benchmark; load pages more quickly on your mobile device | |||
| Acts as a wi-fi hotspot | Yes | vs | No |
| Somewhat common; Share your cellphone's data plan with other devices | |||
| Much faster maximum data rate | 300 Mbit/s (802.11n) | vs | 54 Mbit/s (802.11g) |
| More than 5.5x faster maximum data rate | |||
| Much newer operating system | Android 4.0 Ice Cream Sandwich | vs | Android 1.5 Cupcake |
| Newer Android OS; Get all the latest features and security updates with a more recent version | |||
| Is 4G | Yes | vs | No |
| Somewhat common; Supports the fastest, most reliable networks | |||
| Supports FM radio | Yes | vs | No |
| Somewhat common; Listen to music and news from local radio stations | |||
| Much faster processor | 1.2 GHz | vs | 0.53 GHz |
| Around 2.5x faster processor; run computation-intensive applications, such as photo editing, faster | |||
| Outputs video to TV | Micro USB | vs | None |
| About half of smartphones can output to TVs; the modern day slide projector, great for sharing your photos & videos | |||
| Much better theoretical download speed | 128 Mb/s (WiMAX) | vs | 7.2 Mb/s (HSDPA) |
| Around 18x better theoretical download speed; enjoy lightning fast downloads on modern networks | |||
| Noticeably bigger screen | 4.3" | vs | 3.2" |
| More than 30% bigger screen | |||
| Significantly faster real world upload speeds | 1.37 Mb/s | vs | 0.1 Mb/s |
| Around 13.5x faster actual upload speed | |||
| Significantly sharper screen | 255 ppi | vs | 179 ppi |
| More than 40% sharper PPI; enjoy photo-realistic, crisp images | |||
| More cores | Dual core | vs | Single core |
| Twice as many cores; each additional core lets your phone do more without visible UI slowdowns and jerkiness | |||
| Higher resolution screen | 960 x 540 | vs | 480 x 320 |
| Around 3.5x higher resolution screen | |||
| Has a gyroscope | Yes | vs | No |
| Somewhat common; Play games and use applications that take advantage of device rotation | |||
| Marginally newer | Jun, 2011 | vs | Jul, 2009 |
| Release date over 1 years later | |||
| More highly reviewed by consumers | 81.49% | vs | 73.46% |
| More than 10% more highly reviewed by consumers | |||
| More battery capacity | 1,730 mA·h | vs | 1,350 mA·h |
| Around 30% more battery capacity | |||
| Thinner | 12 mm | vs | 14 mm |
| Around 20% thinner | |||
| Faster real world download speeds | 5.42 Mb/s | vs | 0.36 Mb/s |
| More than 15x faster actual download speed | |||
Reviews Word on the street
HTC Hero | HTC EVO 3D | ||
![]() |
|
| |
|---|---|---|---|
![]() |
|
| |
![]() | Rated 60% by by Jamie-R.-Wilson Rated 100% by by Igor-Molochevski Rated 100% by by T.-Hudson--Carolina-Boy (Feb, 2010) | Rated 100% by by aviosis (Nov, 2012) Rated 100% by by Scott-Showalter (Jun, 2011) Rated 100% by by plokivos (Jun, 2011) | |
Competition What else you should consider
| | 1 | HTC One X Most built-in storage |
| | 2 | Sony Xperia Z Longest battery life during active use |
| | 3 | Sony Xperia P 2-way tie: Records higher resolution videos |
| | 4 | Huawei Ascend G300 Rated the best by consumers |
| | 5 | LG Esteem Really fast browser |
| | 7 | Nokia C7 Transmits music over FM radio |
| | 8 | T-Mobile G1 Has a keyboard |
Discussions Get involved, ask your question about the HTC Hero and HTC EVO 3D
Popular tags:
|







