Compare with...

  • LG Nexus 4
  • Nokia Lumia 920
  • Nokia Lumia 820
  • HTC 8X
  • Samsung Galaxy S Advance
Front view of Samsung Focus S

Samsung Focus S

« Change
vs
Front view of Nokia Lumia 900

Nokia Lumia 900

Change »
$150
  • Windows Phone 7.5 Mango
  • 3.5G
  • 4.3"
  • 1.5 GHz
Released November, 2011
The Samsung Focus S, introduced by AT&T, is a beautiful device: it's thin, it's light (maybe too light), and it sports a gorgeous 4.3-inch Super AMOLED Plus screen, a 1.3-megapixel front-facing camera, and a quite good 8-megapixel rear-facing camera.
Rated 80% by by c|net (Nov, 2011)
 
$213
  • Windows Phone 7.5 Mango
  • 4G
  • 4.3"
  • 1.4 GHz
Released April, 2012
The LTE speeds, high-end features, and crazy-reasonable $99 price tag make the Lumia 900 a sure choice for Windows Phone fans looking for a statement piece to help them stand out.
Rated 83% by by c|net (Apr, 2012)
 

Conclusion Which is better for you?

87%
82%
View Details
13%
32%
94%
91%
View Details
87%
78%
View Details

Winner

NokiaLumia 900

70
71

Features Key features of the Samsung Focus S compared to the Nokia Lumia 900

GHz1.5

Windows Phone 7.5 Mango 3.5G

Back view of Samsung Focus S
Samsung has a knack for making some pretty nice cameras, and the Focus S is the lucky recipient of an 8-megapixel lens and a 1.3-megapixel front-facer.
Rated 80% by by c|net (Nov, 2011)
Back view of Nokia Lumia 900

1.4 GHz

Windows Phone 7.5 Mango 4G

Data performance was pretty awesome on the Lumia 900 — when I was in range of LTE, of course.
Rated 70% by by The Verge (Apr, 2012)

screen size

4.3"
4.3"
I have to give this phone a 5 star ratingThis is a great phone, liked the size, screen is big enough and also fit in pocket.
Lumia 900 by DigiGuru (Apr, 2012)

screen resolution

Samsung Focus S
Nokia Lumia 900
Nokia Drive is so smooth, accurate, fast and with great detail, even better than my Garmin 900.
Lumia 900 by Jun--Jun (Apr, 2012)

memory

0 GB
0.5 GB

0.5 GB
0.5 GB

processor

Samsung Focus S
Nokia Lumia 900
Who cares about dual core quad core because even though i hear it's single core it functions smooth and extremely fast.
Lumia 900 by dbehling (Jun, 2012)

camera resolution

0 MP
8 MP

8 MP
8 MP
The 8 megapixel camera on the Lumia 900 takes great photos but some of the pics did come out a little oversaturated.
Lumia 900 by Bacchus (Apr, 2012)
 

Performance Real world tests of Samsung Focus S vs Nokia Lumia 900

cpu speed

1.5 GHz
1.4 GHz
I was playing with a friends new Droid who was bragging about the memory and dual core processor, but the phone lagged far behind in actual performance.
Lumia 900 by GSD--GSD (Apr, 2012)

talk time

390 min
420 min
although I use the phone around less than 30 minutes talk time and very minimal data usage, also disabled all the background processes I have to charge twice a day!
Lumia 900 by John-Lonappan
 

Differences What are the advantages of each

Advantages compared to the Nokia Lumia 900

Has a removable battery Yes vs No
Somewhat common; Old batteries can be replaced inexpensively
Much lighter 111 g vs 160 g
More than 30% lighter
Much smaller 67 x 126 x 8 mm vs 128 x 69 x 12 mm
Around 35% smaller
More highly reviewed by consumers 86.52% vs 77.89%
More than 10% more highly reviewed by consumers
Quite a bit thinner 8 mm vs 12 mm
More than 30% thinner
Faster processor 1.5 GHz vs 1.4 GHz
More than 5% faster processor; run computation-intensive applications, such as photo editing, faster

Advantages compared to the Samsung Focus S

Is 4G Yes vs No
Somewhat common; Supports the fastest, most reliable networks
Significantly better theoretical download speed 50 Mb/s vs 7.2 Mb/s (HSDPA)
Around 7x better theoretical download speed; enjoy lightning fast downloads on modern networks
More battery capacity 1,830 mA·h vs 1,650 mA·h
More than 10% more battery capacity
Marginally newer Apr, 2012 vs Nov, 2011
Release date 5 months later

Reviews Word on the street

Samsung Focus S

Nokia Lumia 900

Rated 80%
Read the review (Nov, 2011)
The Focus S has a gorgeous 4.3-inch Super AMOLED display with a WVGA resolution of 800x480 pixels, and support for 16 million colors.
Rated 83%
Read the review (Apr, 2012)
Colors look richly hued, bright, and sharp.
Rated 93% by 90 users at amazon.com
I have owned many phones in my lifetime and this is by far the most enjoyable phone I've ever owned.
Rated 100% by by Troy (Nov, 2011)
This phone is just amazing, best phone I have owned or tried thus far.
Rated 100% by by Click (Nov, 2011)
I've also had no issues finding apps that I want in the marketplace and the apps are actually better than Andriod apps, they look better and seem to be faster.
Rated 100% by by E.-M.-Wodka (Jan, 2012)
Rated 88% by 807 users at amazon.com
The phone is also a beautiful unibody design, and the price point can't be beat.
Rated 100% by by LimitedGovernment (May, 2012)
The Phone is very well built and the quality of photographs is very good.
Rated 100% by by Matthew-R.-Hall (Oct, 2012)
One review said that some picture were yellowish and that's true depending on the led flash, but better picture quality then the iphone.
Rated 100% by by J.-Leon--J.L (Apr, 2012)

screen

I compared the Lumia 900 with the Samsung Focus S, which has an identical screen size and WVGA resolution (800x480 pixels).
Nokia Lumia 900 | Rated 83% by by c|net (Apr, 2012)
I compared the Lumia 900 to the iPhone 4S screen (above) and the Samsung Focus S (below), with brightness on full blast.
Nokia Lumia 900 | Rated 83% by by c|net (Apr, 2012)
The capacitive touch screen is slower and less responsive than the Focus S.[The following is solved with a case - see "update" below].
Nokia Lumia 900 | Rated 60% by by Kenneth-Stevenson

focus

I've carried every version of the iPhone including the 4S, the original Samsung Focus, the HTC Trophy, the Samsung Focus S, and the HTC Titan.
Nokia Lumia 900 | Rated 100% by by IShareTek (May, 2012)
I've had the Samsung Focus and the Focus S and now the Lumia 900.
Nokia Lumia 900 | Rated 60% by by Kenneth-Stevenson
The phone is a bit thicker than the FocusS, and if you saw my review of the Focus S, I really didn't like the phone being that thin.
Nokia Lumia 900 | Rated 100% by by Todd (Apr, 2012)

size

It is certainly heavier than the Focus S or other Samsung models, but I've discovered this added weight, combined with the matte finish, assists with gripping ability.
Nokia Lumia 900 | Rated 100% by by R.-L.-Lewis (May, 2012)

visibility

I had read about the Lumia's ClearBlack display and thought it would be the same as my Samsung Focus S. The deep blacks and eye-popping colors are there, but the major difference is looking at this screen in direct sunlight - I can actually see what I'm doing without shading it or finding an angle away from the sunlight.
Nokia Lumia 900 | Rated 100% by by Troy (Apr, 2012)

operating system

As a current WindowsPhone user (Focus S) I'm very familiar with the software and the OS.
Nokia Lumia 900 | Rated 100% by by Todd (Apr, 2012)

Discussions Get involved, ask your question about the Samsung Focus S and Nokia Lumia 900

Samsung
Focus S
Nokia
900

Select aspects that are most important to you: (max 3)

Popular tags: