- Conclusion Get the lowdown
- Features How they compare
- Performance Real world benchmarks
- Differences Technical showdown
- Reviews Word on the street
- Competition Others to consider
- Discussion Answers and opinions
Compare with...
- Apple iPhone 5
- Samsung Galaxy Nexus
- Apple iPhone 4S
- Motorola Droid Razr M
- Pantech Burst
Rated 86% by by The Verge (Oct, 2011)The display on the 4S is Apple’s well regarded 960 x 640 Retina Display, and it looks no less impressive now than it did when the iPhone 4 was first released.
Conclusion Which is better for you?
Features Key features of the Samsung Galaxy Stellar compared to the Apple iPhone 4
GHz1.2
Android 4.0 Ice Cream Sandwich 4G
Rated 70% by by c|net (Sep, 2012)What makes this phone such a great option, though, is that Samsung and Verizon aren't tossing you scraps; the Galaxy Stellar is fully loaded with 4G LTE, Android 4.0 Ice Cream Sandwich, a dual-core processor, a 4-inch display, and camera technology that delivers quality outdoor shots, though not a high megapixel count.
0.8 GHz
iOS 6 3.5G
Rated 100% by by Austin (Nov, 2012)It is the perfect weight although the glass finish makes it slippery in the hand.
screen size
3.4"
3.5"
Galaxy Stellar by c|net (Sep, 2012)It's fine for the Stellar's screen size, where icons and text look typically sharp and bright on the automatic brightness setting.
screen resolution
Galaxy Stellar by c|net (Sep, 2012)Holding and pressing a capacitive touch key won't bring up voice actions, but you'll have your choice of two assistants.
iPhone 4 by Pat (Aug, 2012)The retina display is seriously amazing, and I still haven't seen a phone that truly matches the crispness of this display.
memory
| 0 GB | 0.77 GB | 0.8 GB |
processor
iPhone 4 by The Verge (Oct, 2011)On paper, it may not stand up to the latest and greatest Android phone with 4G radios, a massive screen, and a screaming 1.5GHz dual-core CPU — but in use, it’s easily one of the most capable handsets on the market.
camera resolution
| 0 MP | 5 MP | 5 MP |
Galaxy Stellar by c|net (Sep, 2012)The Samsung Galaxy Stellar's 3.2-megapixel camera takes good outdoor photos.
Performance Real world tests of Samsung Galaxy Stellar vs Apple iPhone 4
cpu speed
iPhone 4 by The Verge (Oct, 2011)As far as processor performance is concerned, the iPhone 4S isn’t kidding around… though don’t expect mind-blowing speed differences between this device and its predecessor.
talk time
1,020 min
840 min
Galaxy Stellar by c|net (Sep, 2012)The Stellar's 2,100mAh battery seems more than equipped to handle daily functions, and anecdotally, this felt like a longer-lasting phone.
iPhone 4 by The Verge (Oct, 2011)In fact, Apple claims that the new phone is capable of an extra hour of talk time while on 3G.
Differences What are the advantages of each
Advantages compared to the Apple iPhone 4
| Supports Adobe Flash | Yes (Android 4.0 Ice Cream Sandwich) | vs | No (iOS) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Somewhat common; Many games and videos on the Internet require Adobe Flash | |||
| Has expandable storage | microSD, microSDHC | vs | None |
| Use storage cards to increase your phone's capacity for apps and data | |||
| Has a removable battery | Yes | vs | No |
| Somewhat common; Old batteries can be replaced inexpensively | |||
| Is 4G | Yes | vs | No |
| Somewhat common; Supports the fastest, most reliable networks | |||
| Significantly more battery capacity | 2,100 mA·h | vs | 1,420 mA·h |
| Around 50% more battery capacity | |||
| Significantly faster processor | 1.2 GHz | vs | 0.8 GHz |
| Around 50% faster processor; run computation-intensive applications, such as photo editing, faster | |||
| More cores | Dual core | vs | Single core |
| Twice as many cores; each additional core lets your phone do more without visible UI slowdowns and jerkiness | |||
| Marginally newer | Sep, 2012 | vs | Jun, 2010 |
| Release date over 2 years later | |||
| Supports multitasking | Yes | vs | No (iOS) |
| Somewhat common; Run multiple apps at once | |||
| Longer talk time | 1,020 min | vs | 840 min |
| More than 20% longer talk time; go days without charging | |||
| Better theoretical download speed | 20 Mb/s (LTE) | vs | 7.2 Mb/s (HSUPA) |
| More than 2.8x better theoretical download speed; enjoy lightning fast downloads on modern networks | |||
Advantages compared to the Samsung Galaxy Stellar
| Has a built-in flash | Yes | vs | No |
|---|---|---|---|
| Somewhat common; Take photos even in poor lighting | |||
| Has a compass | Yes | vs | No |
| Somewhat common; Great for maps and navigation apps | |||
| Much smaller | 59 x 114 x 9 mm | vs | 64 x 124 x 13 mm |
| Around 40% smaller | |||
| Store more stuff | 16 GB | vs | 4 GB |
| 4x more storage capacity; free yourself from memory cards | |||
| Has a gyroscope | Yes | vs | No |
| Somewhat common; Play games and use applications that take advantage of device rotation | |||
| Sharper screen | 329 ppi | vs | 274 ppi |
| More than 20% sharper PPI; enjoy photo-realistic, crisp images | |||
| Quite a bit thinner | 9 mm | vs | 13 mm |
| More than 25% thinner | |||
| Higher resolution screen | 960 x 640 | vs | 800 x 480 |
| 60% higher resolution screen | |||
| Records higher def video | 1280 x 720 @ 30 fps | vs | 800 x 480 @ 15 fps |
| More than 4.8x higher def video | |||
| Higher resolution front camera | 5 MP | vs | 3.2 MP |
| More than 55% higher resolution front camera; Video chat with other people | |||
| More highly reviewed by consumers | 71.8% | vs | 68.56% |
| Around 5% more highly reviewed by consumers | |||
| Slightly longer standby time | 18,000 min | vs | 12,960 min |
| Around 40% longer standby time | |||
Reviews Word on the street
Samsung Galaxy Stellar | Apple iPhone 4 | ||
![]() |
|
| |
|---|---|---|---|
![]() | Rated 80% by by ChristineInCleveland (Mar, 2013) Rated 100% by by Chris-Rush (Oct, 2012) Rated 80% by by jason (Sep, 2012) | Rated 100% by by Tony-Q-Garcia (Dec, 2012) Rated 100% by by LoganReddel (Oct, 2010) Rated 100% by by Tina-N (Feb, 2013) | |
Competition What else you should consider
| | 1 | Apple iPhone 5 Most built-in storage |
| | 2 | Samsung Galaxy Nexus Rated the best by consumers |
| | 4 | Motorola Droid Razr M 2-way tie: Fastest processor |
| | 5 | Pantech Burst 2-way tie: Fastest processor |
| | 6 | Samsung Droid Charge Least latency on actual networks |
| | 7 | Samsung Admire 4-way tie: Has a removable battery |






