Compare with...

  • LG Nexus 4
  • Sony Xperia V
  • Sony Xperia SL
  • Sony Xperia P
  • Apple iPhone 5
Front view of Sony Xperia acro S

Sony Xperia acro S

« Change
vs
Front view of Sony Xperia S

Sony Xperia S

Change »
Ranked #1 and #2 in 3.5G Sony phones
$356
  • Android 4.0 Ice Cream Sandwich
  • 3.5G
  • 4.3"
  • Dual core 1.5 GHz
Released August, 2012
+ Very good photos and video fullHD+ Waterproof it's true.
Rated 80% by by A.G. (Jan, 2013)
 
$340
  • Android 4.0 Ice Cream Sandwich
  • 3.5G
  • 4.3"
  • Dual core 1.5 GHz
Released February, 2012
The extra depth makes the tablet top-heavy though, which is something to consider.
by GSM Arena (Oct, 2012)
 

Conclusion Which is better for you?

92%
95%
View Details
?
?
View Details
94%
95%
View Details
87%
77%
View Details

Winner

SonyXperia acro S

84
82

Features Key features of the Sony Xperia acro S compared to the Sony Xperia S

GHz1.5

Android 4.0 Ice Cream Sandwich 3.5G

Front view of Sony Xperia acro S
This phone is great in many aspects including its water resistant as a plus.
Rated 100% by by A.-Charoensupyanan (Feb, 2013)
Back view of Sony Xperia S

1.5 GHz

Android 4.0 Ice Cream Sandwich 3.5G

Still, considering how thick those old 12MP shooters were (especially around the camera), 10.6mm sounds great.
by GSM Arena (Mar, 2012)

screen size

4.3"
4.3"
The screen has better size than the iPhone 4, not sure if you compare it to the 5.
Xperia acro S by Guido-A-Uzcategui-P (Jan, 2013)
The design is so cool, display is a good size 4,3", the best is the camera 12mp and multimedia, your memory is big, is faster for all.
Xperia S by chicho2002 (Oct, 2012)

screen resolution

Sony Xperia acro S
Sony Xperia S
It is fairly accurate in colors (not overly saturated), has good viewing angles, and looks very sharp (highest PPI in phones).
Xperia acro S by rawr (Oct, 2012)
Tew/CNET). Outdoors in plenty of sunlight, the phone captured images with brighter colors though details still had a flat character.
Xperia S by c|net (Jul, 2012)

memory

0 GB
1 GB

1 GB
1 GB

processor

Sony Xperia acro S
Sony Xperia S
The acro S performed very well against the dual-core competition, Kraits aside.
Xperia acro S by GSM Arena (Sep, 2012)
But in normal daily usage and gaming you won't feel the differences between dual-core and quad-core.
Xperia S by Lui-Lai--Alan (Jun, 2012)

camera resolution

0 MP
12.1 MP

12.1 MP
20 MP
The Xperia acro S boasts a 12 megapixel camera with a back-illuminated Exmor R sensor and a single LED flash.
Xperia acro S by GSM Arena (Sep, 2012)
Its 4.3-inch display has a 1280 x 720 resolution, the camera features a 12-megapixel Exmor R sensor, and beating inside is a dual-core Snapdragon heart clocked at 1.5GHz.
Xperia S by The Verge (Mar, 2012)
 

Performance Real world tests of Sony Xperia acro S vs Sony Xperia S

cpu speed

1.5 GHz
I expect more speed in web browsing, however being a dual core processor it wasn`t.Don`t get me wrong but if you cant take to deal with charging the phone 2 times a day or maybe more, wait for sony to present a phone With a higher performance or if you want it , buy it, but, keep a second Phone available when the acro leaves you in the midle of the way.
Xperia acro S by Roger-G (Oct, 2012)
Comparing my SE Arc with this phone proves that speed has increased significantly thanks to the dual core processor.
Xperia S by Martin--apartoflife

talk time

400 min
450 min
Behind it sits a 1910 mAh battery, which is rated at up to 290h of stand-by on 2G networks (310h on 3G) or 6h and 40 mins of talk time (7h 10 min on 3G).
Xperia acro S by GSM Arena (Sep, 2012)
The battery is a 1750 mAh unit, which is said to provide about 450 hours of 2G stand-by (420 hours in 3G) or up to 7 hours and 30 minutes of talk time in 2G (8 hours and 30 minutes in 3G).
Xperia S by GSM Arena (Mar, 2012)
 

Differences What are the advantages of each

Advantages compared to the Xperia S

Is waterproof Yes vs No
Somewhat common; Protected against the elements--and accidents
Has expandable storage microSD, microSDHC vs None
Use storage cards to increase your phone's capacity for apps and data
More highly reviewed by consumers 86.92% vs 76.56%
More than 10% more highly reviewed by consumers
More battery capacity 1,910 mA·h vs 1,750 mA·h
Around 10% more battery capacity
Marginally newer Aug, 2012 vs Feb, 2012
Release date 6 months later

Advantages compared to the Xperia acro S

Store significantly more stuff 32 GB vs 16 GB
2x more storage capacity; free yourself from memory cards
Smaller 64 x 128 x 11 mm vs 66 x 126 x 12 mm
More than 10% smaller
Longer standby time 27,000 min vs 17,400 min
Around 60% longer standby time
Thinner 11 mm vs 12 mm
More than 10% thinner

Reviews Word on the street

Sony Xperia acro S

Sony Xperia S

Rated 86% by 68 users at amazon.com
I'm not liking Android at all (ICS, still waiting Jelly Bean) iOS is much more easier to use, elegant and easier to set up.
Rated 60% by by Guido-A-Uzcategui-P (Jan, 2013)
Audio quality is good, headphone output is clear.
Rated 100% by by rawr (Oct, 2012)
The HDMI port is also a standard micro plug, unlike some others where they are combined with the USB port.
Rated 100% by by rawr (Oct, 2012)
Rated 87% by 242 users at amazon.com
the stock version of android is great and the multimedia capabilities are awesome(audio and video), i love my SONY Xperia S.
Rated 100% by by Luis-Castillo-M (Mar, 2013)
At least Xperia S has a unique design, 12MP Camera with Sony Exmor R sensor, highest DPI LCD screen.
Rated 100% by by Lui-Lai--Alan (Jun, 2012)
I love the huge screen and gorgeous display.
Rated 100% by by Rubella (Aug, 2012)

screen

The screen on the Sony Xperia acro S promises great things and it delivers - it's mesmerizingly sharp, with punchy colors and very good contrast.
Sony Xperia acro S | by GSM Arena (Sep, 2012)
The Xperia acro S produces smooth videos with good colors but the level of detail isn't anything special.
Sony Xperia acro S | by GSM Arena (Sep, 2012)
You will immediately notice a difference if you use the acro S after, say, the 8.5mm Galaxy S II, which has a screen of the same diagonal (and slightly larger size due to aspect difference), but the Sony smartphone is not hard to operate by any means.
Sony Xperia acro S | by GSM Arena (Sep, 2012)

camera

Thanks to the proximity and accelerometer sensors, the Sony Xperia acro S automatically disables the touchscreen when you lift it up during a call.
Sony Xperia acro S | by GSM Arena (Sep, 2012)
There isn't a macro mode on the acro S so focusing up close is done automatically.
Sony Xperia acro S | by GSM Arena (Sep, 2012)
The Xperia acro S camcorder features continuous autofocus.
Sony Xperia acro S | by GSM Arena (Sep, 2012)

video

The Sony Xperia acro S captures 1080p and 720p videos at 30 fps, currently the upper limit of what you can expect from a smartphone.
Sony Xperia acro S | by GSM Arena (Sep, 2012)
Watching a video on the Xperia acro S. DivX and XviD videos are also working on the Sony Xperia acro S. The support isn't the best we've seen, but if you we had pretty good success with the 720p samples we threw at it and even some 1080p videos ran well.
Sony Xperia acro S | by GSM Arena (Sep, 2012)
The Xperia acro S got a solid 36.9 frames per second here, which is a stellar result when compared to other dual-core devices with fewer pixels to push out.
Sony Xperia acro S | by GSM Arena (Sep, 2012)

cpu

Linpack tests the calculative performance of the two Scorpion cores inside the Xperia acro S. It won a midrange spot for itself, as expected.
Sony Xperia acro S | by GSM Arena (Sep, 2012)
If you can get over the lack of two extra cores and ICS at launch (the update is coming), there's plenty to like about the Sony Xperia S..
Sony Xperia S | by GSM Arena (Mar, 2012)
With quad-cores just around the corner, you'd be forgiven for having doubts about the Xperia S, but Sony have actually done quite well at squeezing the best possible performance out of it.
Sony Xperia S | by GSM Arena (Mar, 2012)

cores

The Xperia S hasn't got a quad-core processor (not even a next-gen dual-core) and it only comes with Android 2.3 Gingerbread out of the box for now.
Sony Xperia S | by GSM Arena (Mar, 2012)
The super-slim metal-clad HTC One S also costs about the same as the acro S, but puts two Krait cores and an AMOLED screen into the mix.
Sony Xperia acro S | by GSM Arena (Sep, 2012)
We begin with the Quadrant benchmark where the Xperia acro S did its best but against mostly quad-core competition.
Sony Xperia acro S | by GSM Arena (Sep, 2012)

Discussions Get involved, ask your question about the Sony Xperia acro S and Sony Xperia S

Sony
Xperia acro S
Sony
S

Select aspects that are most important to you: (max 3)

Popular tags:

Unanswered Questions

January 7, 2013
What is much better for games,app,instagram,battery life,video?

What is much better for games app,instgram battery life,video, beacause i have a plan to buy a sony xperia acro s...but ineed a advice.. so the acro s 16gb only so can expnd the memory until 32?...

Visitor
0
Answers