- Conclusion Get the lowdown
- Features How they compare
- Performance Real world benchmarks
- Differences Technical showdown
- Reviews Word on the street
- Competition Others to consider
- Discussion Answers and opinions
Compare with...
- Google Nexus 7
- Samsung Galaxy Note 10.1
- Apple iPad 4
- Asus Eee Pad Transformer TF300
- Asus Transformer Pad Infinity TF700T
- 10.1"
- 16 GB
- WiFi 3G
- Android 4.2 Jelly Bean
by TrustedReviews (Nov, 2012)The Exynos 5250 is faster than any other dual-core tablet chip we've seen, and isn't too far off quad-core chips like Tegra 3.
Rated 80% by by TrustedReviews (Oct, 2012)Its size is large enough to discard mobile sites in favour of the full-fat versions, and the capacitive screen is extremely responsive and allows multi-touch gestures.
Conclusion Which is better for you?
Features Key features of the Google Nexus 10 compared to the Amazon Kindle Fire HD
“10.1
Android 4.2 Jelly Bean
by TrustedReviews (Nov, 2012)It's "just" a dual-core chip, but its advanced architecture means it provides superb performance.
8.9”
Android 4.0 Ice Cream Sandwich
Rated 80% by by c|net (Sep, 2012)Images and text are sharper thanks to the higher resolution and higher contrast of the screen.
screen size
10.1"
8.9"
Nexus 10 by TrustedReviews (Nov, 2012)Samsung has used a soft-touch finish on the rear, which is a good second-place choice.
Kindle Fire HD by Robin-C.-Bryant--Mrs.-Bryant (Nov, 2012)I LOVE the HD display as well as the size of the new kindle fire.
screen resolution
Kindle Fire HD by Gregory-S.-MacBeth---Be-polite--be-professional--but-have-a-plan-to-kill-everybody-you-meet.--Gen-Mattis (Dec, 2012)With a resolution of 1920 x 1200 you will easily be able to watch videos in full HD brilliance and to be honest anything beyond this resolution in this size of a screen is overkill that is just using more power.
processor
Nexus 10 by TrustedReviews (Nov, 2012)And if you put a single core of the Exynos against a core of the Tegra 3 chip, there'd be no contest - the Exynos would win hands down.
Kindle Fire HD by Tony-Chang (Dec, 2012)My phone (Atrix HD) runs faster than my Kindle Fire HD 8.9, and my phone isn't even that fast (has same dual core 1.5ghz though).
Performance Real world tests of Google Nexus 10 vs Amazon Kindle Fire HD
cpu speed
Differences What are the advantages of each
Advantages compared to the Amazon Kindle Fire HD
| Much higher resolution screen | 2560 x 1600 | vs | 1920 x 1200 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Around 80% higher resolution screen | |||
| Bigger screen | 10.1" | vs | 8.9" |
| More than 10% bigger screen | |||
| Supports 3G | Yes | vs | No |
| Somewhat common; be online anywhere that has cell coverage | |||
| Sharper screen | 300 ppi | vs | 254 ppi |
| Around 20% sharper PPI; enjoy photo-realistic, crisp images | |||
| Faster processor | 1.7 GHz | vs | 1.5 GHz |
| More than 10% faster processor; run computation-intensive applications, such as photo editing, faster | |||
| Much faster USB | 572 MB/s | vs | 57 MB/s (USB 2.0) |
| More than 10x faster USB; connect a high-speed external hard drive or other high-speed device | |||
Advantages compared to the Google Nexus 10
Sortable is not aware of any important advantages of the Amazon Kindle Fire HD vs the Google Nexus 10.
Reviews Word on the street
Google Nexus 10 | Amazon Kindle Fire HD | ||
![]() | | | |
|---|---|---|---|
![]() | |
| |
![]() | | Rated 100% by by anonymous (Nov, 2012) Rated 100% by by jade (Dec, 2012) Rated 80% by by W.-Dietrich--WD (Feb, 2013) | |
Competition What else you should consider
| | 3 | Apple iPad 4 Faster sunspider 0.9.1 benchmark |
| | 4 | Asus Eee Pad Transformer TF300 3-way tie: Higher resolution rear camera |
| | 6 | Apple iPad 3 4-way tie: Largest amount of storage capacity |
| | 7 | Samsung Galaxy Tab 2 10.1" 4-way tie: Supports Flash |









