- Conclusion Get the lowdown
- Features How it compares
- Performance Real world benchmarks
- Differences Technical showdown
- Reviews Word on the street
- Competition Others to consider
- Discussion Answers and opinions
-front.jpg)
Philips 4000 Series (2010)
- 32" 1080p LCD
#1 in cheapest LCD Philips TVs
Released April, 2010
Rated 100% by by Joe (Apr, 2011)The picture quality is great, the remote is easy to use, it was easy to update the TV's software, it works great with my notebook via HDMI cable to stream internet programs/movies and youtube videos.
Conclusion Check out the Philips 4000 Series (2010)
First reviewed December, 2011
Features Key features of the Philips 4000 Series (2010)
-front.jpg)
32”
LCD
Rated 100% by by Great-Faulkner-s-Ghost (Aug, 2011)The picture is clear and crisp, especially in high definition using the HDMI cable from my Comcast box.
size
32"
60"
19"
4000 Series (2010) by A.-Bryant (Jan, 2011)Picture quality is high, particularly for a screen of this size.
4000 Series (2010) by Joseph-P.With flat panel displays, it's the norm that when you say a screen is 22 inches, that its viewable diagonal distance is indeed is 22 inches.
thickness
4000 Series (2010) by rob-the-computer-guy (Oct, 2010)They were light and thin, and displayed a great picture.
4000 Series (2010) by C.-CATARASO--Design-nut (Oct, 2011)just right size and thickness as to NOT be first thing you see as you walk in ...BEST of all is that I can also use television as my Monitor.
Performance Real world tests of Philips 4000 Series (2010)
power consumption
4000 Series (2010) by James-F.-Coyne--Jimdamick (Sep, 2011)It is just the right size, has a very good picture, but limited audio performance.
Our analysis How does it stack up against its top 10 competitors
pros
-
AC-3, MP3 -
JPEG -
2 -
EasyLink -
32" -
1920 x 1080 -
1080p -
200 mm x 200 mm
cons
-
128 Watts -
0 -
0 -
188 mm -
0 -
0
Reviews Word on the street
 |   Rated by 204 users at amazon.com Rated 100% by by Chris-M--junk250 (Apr, 2011) Rated 60% by by the-Dish (Jan, 2012)  |
|---|---|
Audio quality
Philips 4000 Series (2010) 32" | Rated 100% by by Joe (Apr, 2011)I won't comment on the audio because I don't listen to the audio through the TV speakers.
Philips 4000 Series (2010) 32" | Rated 80% by by N.-Breuer (Apr, 2011)Not a whole lot of menu options and the sound is not great since the speakers are facing down, but other than that it is a great buy for the price!
Philips 4000 Series (2010) 32" | Rated 20% by by Robert-A.-Gilliam (Dec, 2010)Listening to digital TV on my high-quality headphones, the audio quality is mediocre.
Video
Philips 4000 Series (2010) 32" | Rated 80% by by jred (Dec, 2010)The video quality is great and it is extremely light.
Philips 4000 Series (2010) 32" | Rated 80% by by LovemesomeAmazon (May, 2011)Pros: The video quality is great.
Philips 4000 Series (2010) 32" | Rated 40% by by MTBrider (Mar, 2011)I have a 32" 720p tv that I have had for 5 years and this Philips 22" makes my 32" look like it is 1080p.
Picture quality
Philips 4000 Series (2010) 32" | Rated 100% by by tbone (Apr, 2011)Colors are vivid and calm and the picture is clear.
Philips 4000 Series (2010) 32" | Rated 100% by by Stuart-Michael-Feistner (Oct, 2011)For the price, the definition and quality is crystal clear.
Philips 4000 Series (2010) 32" | Rated 20% by by Tommy (Sep, 2012)The picture on this TV had been sharp and crisp.
Content
Philips 4000 Series (2010) 32" | Rated 100% by by WaterfordJim (Sep, 2011)For watching sports or even movies, it sounds fine.
Philips 4000 Series (2010) 32" | Rated 60% by by J.-Hammel (May, 2011)Games look adequate from my ps3, and while I realize it is a smaller screen, I still feel my 32" LG blows this thing out of the water in picture clarity.
Philips 4000 Series (2010) 32" | Rated 80% by by Ed-from-Las-Cruces (Sep, 2011)Echoing what other sites have said, I am very happy with the ease of installation and start-up, with the quality of the picture, and am content that, for the price, the sound is adequate but hardly a plus.
Sharpness
Philips 4000 Series (2010) 32" | Rated 60% by by electronicnut (Jun, 2012)I compared it to my plain 17inch monitor and noticed that the 17inch monitor was more crisp and the text was more sharp.
Philips 4000 Series (2010) 32" | Rated 100% by by Emma-Beel (May, 2011)The images are amazing, great colors, great sharpness.
Philips 4000 Series (2010) 32" | Rated 100% by by V (Mar, 2011)Picture quality is normal, crisp and clear.
Competition What else you should consider
 | 2 | Sharp SV29U 2-way tie: More RF inputs Sharp SV29U vs Philips 4000 Series (2010) |
 | 3 | Philips 3000 Series Uses least power 3000 Series 19" vs 4000 Series (2010) 32" |
 | 4 | LG LV2400 3-way tie: More optical audio outputs LG LV2400 vs Philips 4000 Series (2010) |
 | 5 | Samsung 450 Series (2010) Rated the best by consumers Samsung 450 Series (2010) vs Philips 4000 Series (2010) |
 | 6 | Coby 23 5-way tie: High definition video mode Coby 23 vs Philips 4000 Series (2010) |
 | 7 | Toshiba SL410U 3-way tie: High native resolution Toshiba SL410U vs Philips 4000 Series (2010) |
-front.jpg)
New duel?
Let the battle continue or dare to compare.
Discussions Get involved, ask your question about the Philips 4000 Series (2010)
Popular tags:
|
