Compare with...

  • Sony BRAVIA HX750 Series
  • LG LS3400
  • LG LV3700
  • LG LS4600
  • LG PA4500
Front view of LG PW350

LG PW350

« Change
vs
Front view of LG LS3500

LG LS3500

Change »
  • 42" 1080p Plasma
  • 3D
Released January, 2011
This resolution is also te usual native resolution of mid range laptops from 11.6 inches to 14 inches.
Rated 60% by by Gil-Farrales (Oct, 2011)
 
  • 32" 720p LCD
  • 60 Hz
Released February, 2012
At this size, the 720 resolution is nice.
Rated 100% by by wins (Jan, 2013)
 

Conclusion Which is better for you?

70%
55%
View Details
44%
62%
100%
100%
View Details
84%
85%
View Details

Winner

LGLS3500

74
75

Features Key features of the LG PW350 compared to the LG LS3500

42

Plasma

Front view of LG PW350
The LG appears to have slightly finer resolution (although the 2 have same spec) and very good color rendition, although I prefer the Panny's color.
Rated 100% by by CodeZebra (Mar, 2012)
Front view of LG LS3500

32

LCD

On the up side, picture is great, unit looks good and is very light weight and thin.
Rated 60% by by Fabien

size

42"
32"
Regarding the 3D effect, I've watch Tron Legacy and Avatar (3D encoded using a PS3) - the picture is stunning and the 3D effect is good with minimal ghosting.
PW350 by R.-Hiltz (Aug, 2011)
HD pictures fill the screen on by big lg tv, but only display in letterbox format on this new 22" tv.
LS3500 by Xpert-Shopper (Jun, 2012)

thickness

LG PW350
LG LS3500
It has a very slim sleek dimention.
PW350 by louis-polyi (Apr, 2012)
The sound was surprising for such a thin television.
LS3500 by Danielle-Gross (Mar, 2013)
 

Performance Real world tests of LG PW350 vs LG LS3500

 

Differences What are the advantages of each

Advantages compared to the LS3500 32"

Has native 24p support 3:3 Pulldown @ 72Hz vs None
Very few TVs have native 24p support
Supports 3D Yes vs No
Somewhat common; enjoy realistic 3D videos at home
Much better video mode 1080p vs 720p
Around 2.5x better best resolution
More optical audio outputs 1 vs 0
1 more optical audio outputs
Bigger 42" vs 32"
More than 30% bigger
More composite A/V inputs 2 vs 1
Twice as many composite A/V inputs
More USB ports 2 vs 1
Twice as many USB ports
More D-Sub inputs 1 vs 0
1 more D-Sub inputs; great for hooking up to a computer
More HDMI ports 3 vs 2
1 more HDMI ports
More RF inputs 1 vs 0
1 more RF inputs

Advantages compared to the PW350 42"

Lighter 8,300 g vs 20,003 g
2.4x lighter
Higher native resolution 1280 x 720 vs 1024 x 768
Around 20% higher native resolution

Reviews Word on the street

LG PW350

LG LS3500

Rated 83% by 33 users at amazon.com
I thought that images would not be as clear and crisp as I wanted them to, but I soon found out that I was wrong.
Rated 80% by by Travis-Keatley (Dec, 2011)
It's not 1080p but 720p looks darn good and is good enough for me.
Rated 80% by by Will (Jul, 2011)
I would suggest passive 3d televisions beacause the glasses are cheaper and easier to replace.
Rated 60% by by yeppers (Apr, 2012)
Rated 85% by 61 users at amazon.com
The light-sensing technology and automatic brightness adjustment work extremely well, as the TV lowers the brightness during nighttime viewing with the lights off.
Rated 100% by by Eric (May, 2012)
The picture is crisp and the sound is good.
Rated 80% by by CD (Jul, 2012)
My eyes are better adjusted with the smaller screen, but it is still big enough to read small text from 4-5 ft..
Rated 100% by by Danielle-Gross (Mar, 2013)

Discussions Get involved, ask your question about the LG PW350 and LG LS3500

LG
PW350
LG
LS3500

Select aspects that are most important to you: (max 3)

Popular tags: