Compare with...

  • Vizio E Series
  • Sharp AQUOS 830 Series
  • LG LW5600
  • Samsung 630 Series (2011)
  • LG PT350
vs
Front view of LG LW9800

LG LW9800

Change »
  • 40" 1080p LCD
  • 240 Hz
Released April, 2010
40PFL5706/F7. Philips' Cinema picture preset came closest to producing an accurate picture, and we couldn't do much to adjust it during calibration.
Rated 55% by by c|net (Jul, 2011)
 
  • 55" 1080p LED-backlit
  • 3D
  • Internet enabled
Released September, 2011
As expected, the THX Cinema mode came closest to our ideal picture settings out of the box.
Rated 76% by by c|net (Oct, 2011)
 

Conclusion Which is better for you?

42%
93%
View Details
23%
31%
100%
100%
View Details
66%
81%
View Details

Winner

LGLW9800

57
76

Features Key features of the Philips 5000 Series (2011) compared to the LG LW9800

40

LCD

Front view of Philips 5000 Series (2011)
It also preserved contrast (black level) at least as well as the other LCDs.
Rated 55% by by c|net (Jul, 2011)
Back view of LG LW9800

55

LED-backlit

Both types of 3D TV can handle any of the new 3D formats used by Blu-ray, TV broadcasts, and video games, and both require viewers to don 3D glasses, but each has its advantages and disadvantages.
Rated 76% by by c|net (Oct, 2011)

size

40"
55"
We performed a hands-on evaluation of the 40-inch Philips 40PFL5706/F7, but this review also applies to the other screen sizes in the series.
5000 Series (2011) by c|net (Jul, 2011)
To me passive 3D gives a better viewing experience and getting extra 3D glasses is very cheap.
LW9800 by Blackhorseguy (Nov, 2011)

thickness

Philips 5000 Series (2011)
LG LW9800
It looses the warmth and depth in background, and again seems choppy when the focus person or object moves, and looks really processed (like a computer straining to keep up with rate) if the background moves.
5000 Series (2011) by Wiseguy-945
Although graced with a single-pane face-meaning the bezel and the screen are fronted by one sheet of plastic-a transparent-edged frame, and a relatively thin bezel, the LG LW9800 ultimately isn't as stylish as competing TVs like Sony's monolithic XBR-HX929 or Samsung's stunning, all-picture UND8000.
LW9800 by c|net (Oct, 2011)
 

Performance Real world tests of Philips 5000 Series (2011) vs LG LW9800

 

Differences What are the advantages of each

Advantages compared to the LG LW9800

Is DLNA DMR Yes vs No
Somewhat common; other devices can control the TV; better for home automation
Lighter 18,370 g vs 28,984 g
More than 35% lighter

Advantages compared to the Philips 5000 Series (2011)

Significantly bigger 55" vs 40"
Around 40% bigger
Supports Skype Yes vs No
Somewhat common; video chat with friends from the comfort of your living room
Supports 3D Yes vs No
Somewhat common; enjoy realistic 3D videos at home
Has built-in Ethernet Yes vs No
Somewhat common; access streaming content over the Internet
Is DLNA DMP Yes vs No
Somewhat common; easier to share and enjoy your digital photos, music and video
Has Wi-Fi built-in, 802.11n vs None
Most TVs don't have Wi-Fi; access streaming content with no wires
More USB ports 2 vs 1
Twice as many USB ports
Much more highly reviewed by consumers 81.16% vs 65.71%
Around 25% more highly reviewed by consumers
Much slimmer 25 mm vs 262 mm
10.3x slimmer
Has a VESA mount 400 mm x 400 mm vs None
Very few TVs have a VESA mount; easily mount your TV on a wall using standardized hardware

Reviews Word on the street

Philips 5000 Series (2011)

LG LW9800

Rated 55%
Read the review (Jul, 2011)
We experienced better stability and range when we connected the TV via Ethernet instead of using the TV's Wi-Fi connection.
Rated 76%
Read the review (Oct, 2011)
The LW9800 did evince improved uniformity compared with the two 2010 LG local dimmers, as well as excellent color, but overall its 2D picture fell short of the best 2011 LEDs, including the Sony XBR-HX929 and Sony KDL-55NX720.
Rated 76% by 98 users at amazon.com
No 3d, from what I've heard 3d is not perfected yet and the televisions that are 3d do not display 2d very well.
Rated 100% by by Nicholas-Winn--E-Bike-Enthusiast
HD programming is crystal clear and sharp.
Rated 100% by by M.-Schapker--schap (Dec, 2010)
The "240hz" system smooths out normal viewing very nicely and the TV screen itself is reasonably non-reflective (I've never noticed reflection issues on the screen and I have a VERY bright room with french doors and three windows in front of the TV).
Rated 100% by by Ncineration (Jan, 2012)
Rated 86% by 3 users at amazon.com
Out of the box, it performed well - bright sharp picture with rich color and deep blacks.
Rated 100% by by Blackhorseguy (Nov, 2011)
After watching the set for several weeks now, I have to say that it has the best picture quality that I've ever seen.
Rated 100% by by Blackhorseguy (Nov, 2011)
I've read that passive 3D sets like mine cannot display as good a picture as active 3D sets, and some reviewers complain about jagged edges on diagonal objects and circles.
Rated 100% by by Blackhorseguy (Nov, 2011)

Discussions Get involved, ask your question about the Philips 5000 Series (2011) and LG LW9800

Philips
5000 Series (2011)
LG
LW9800

Select aspects that are most important to you: (max 3)

Popular tags: