- Conclusion Get the lowdown
- Features How they compare
- Performance Real world benchmarks
- Differences Technical showdown
- Reviews Word on the street
- Competition Others to consider
- Discussion Answers and opinions
Compare with...
- LG LM7600
- LG LW6500
- Samsung 7900 Series
- Samsung 6500 Series
- LG LM8600
-front.jpg)
Rated 81% by by c|net (Apr, 2011)Samsung's remote app on our Android phone worked quite well, with excellent response times and most of the functionality we wanted.
- 55" 1080p LED-backlit
- 3D
- Internet enabled
Released September, 2011
Rated 76% by by c|net (Oct, 2011)Both types of 3D TV can handle any of the new 3D formats used by Blu-ray, TV broadcasts, and video games, and both require viewers to don 3D glasses, but each has its advantages and disadvantages.
Conclusion Which is better for you?
Features Key features of the Samsung 8000 Series (2011 LCD) compared to the LG LW9800
“55
LED-backlit
-back.jpg)
Rated 80% by by Ncruze (Dec, 2011)The remote feels nice in hand and love the idea of Samsung adding the qwerty keyboard the back of the remote for browsing purposes BUT IT'S UTTERLY USELESS!! Why?
55”
LED-backlit
Rated 100% by by Blackhorseguy (Nov, 2011)To me passive 3D gives a better viewing experience and getting extra 3D glasses is very cheap.
size
55"
55"
8000 Series (2011 LCD) by c|net (Apr, 2011)We performed a hands-on evaluation of the 55-inch Samsung UN55D8000, but this review also applies to the other screen sizes in the series.
LW9800 by Blackhorseguy (Nov, 2011)I've read that passive 3D sets like mine cannot display as good a picture as active 3D sets, and some reviewers complain about jagged edges on diagonal objects and circles.
thickness
8000 Series (2011 LCD) by Stephen-Gates--Steve-GThere is no denying that this TV looks beautiful with it's thin edge and it's slim design makes it look fantastic when you out it on the wall.
LW9800 by c|net (Oct, 2011)Although graced with a single-pane face-meaning the bezel and the screen are fronted by one sheet of plastic-a transparent-edged frame, and a relatively thin bezel, the LG LW9800 ultimately isn't as stylish as competing TVs like Sony's monolithic XBR-HX929 or Samsung's stunning, all-picture UND8000.
Performance Real world tests of Samsung 8000 Series (2011 LCD) vs LG LW9800
power consumption
8000 Series (2011 LCD) by c|net (Apr, 2011)We did not test the power consumption of this size in the Samsung UND8000 series, but we did test the 55-inch model.
black levels
8000 Series (2011 LCD) by Flyer215 (Aug, 2011)I am amazed with the black levels that this set produce which contrast well will the vibrant colors that the set produces.
LW9800 by c|net (Oct, 2011)While solid in Low mode, the black levels of the LG LW9800 were visibly brighter than on the other high-end TVs in our lineup.
contrast ratio
8000 Series (2011 LCD) by eDER80 (Jan, 2012)The picture quality is simply AMAZING!!! 25 million in contrast ratio,1080p 240 Hz with a 960 clear motion rate( which eliminates blur and gives great smooth motion on any fast scene),WiFi,internet browser, need i say more?!?!?! The incredible detail, deep blacks and rich colors will leave you breathless!
LW9800 by Blackhorseguy (Nov, 2011)Out of the box, it performed well - bright sharp picture with rich color and deep blacks.
Differences What are the advantages of each
-front.jpg)
Advantages compared to the LG LW9800
| Average power consumption | 105 Watts | vs | 270 Watts |
|---|---|---|---|
| Consumes 2.6x less power | |||
| More USB ports | 3 | vs | 2 |
| 1 more USB ports | |||
| Supports picture-in-picture | Yes | vs | No |
| Somewhat common; keep an eye on two channels at once | |||
| Significantly thinner bezel width at widest point | 5.08 mm | vs | 25.4 mm |
| 5x thinner bezel width at widest point | |||
| Has a QWERTY remote | Yes | vs | No |
| Somewhat common; type more naturally with a full keyboard on the remote | |||
| Thinner bezel width at narrowest point | 5.08 mm | vs | 25.4 mm |
| 5x thinner bezel width at narrowest point | |||
| Lighter | 16,193 g | vs | 28,984 g |
| More than 40% lighter | |||
| Slightly deeper blacks | 0.004 cd/sq. m. | vs | 0.0108 cd/sq. m. |
| 2.7x deeper blacks | |||
Advantages compared to the Samsung 8000 Series (2011 LCD)
| Much cheaper 3D glasses | FPR 3D Glasses, 15 dollars | vs | SSG-3700CR, 130 dollars |
|---|---|---|---|
| 8.7x cheaper 3D glasses | |||
| Significantly more consistent calibrated gamma | 2.21 | vs | 2.16 |
| 6x more consistent calibrated gamma | |||
| Has a VESA mount | 400 mm x 400 mm | vs | None |
| Very few TVs have a VESA mount; easily mount your TV on a wall using standardized hardware | |||
Reviews Word on the street
Samsung 8000 Series (2011 LCD) | LG LW9800 | ||
 |  
|
| |
|---|---|---|---|
 | Rated by 492 users at amazon.com Rated 100% by by Sim (Feb, 2012) Rated 100% by by Rohit (Dec, 2011) Rated 80% by by Arijit-Chowdhury |  Rated by 3 users at amazon.com Rated 100% by by Blackhorseguy (Nov, 2011) Rated 100% by by Blackhorseguy (Nov, 2011) | |
Competition What else you should consider
 | 2 | LG LW6500 Highest contrast ratio |
 | 4 | Samsung 6500 Series 3-way tie: Supports picture-in-picture |
 | 5 | LG LM8600 3-way tie: Has a QWERTY remote |
 | 6 | LG LM6700 4-way tie: Thinnest |
 | 7 | LG LM9600 Biggest screen |
-front.jpg)
Popular Questions
September 22, 2012
LG 3D glasses work on a Samsung TV?
I bought a new 55" Samsung 8000 Series (UN55D8000) 3D TV and I also have 55" LG LW9800 3D TV on the other room. Since both TVs are under South Korean TV manufacturers, will my LG 3D glasses work...
Visitor
1
Answers Samsung 8000 Series (2011 LCD)
LG LW9800
twinkle123 
Beginner I
I understand that 3D glasses are quite expensive. However, your current LG 3D glasses are polarized and only work on any cinema passive 3D TV Types. On the other hand, Samsung's 3D glasses are 3D... View twinkle123's recommendation
- 0 comments
- September 22, 2012
- Reply to: LG 3D glasses work on a Samsung TV?
