Compare with...

  • Samsung 8000 Series (2011 LCD)
  • Sony BRAVIA NX720 Series
  • Sony BRAVIA HX820 Series
  • Sony BRAVIA HX750 Series
  • Panasonic Viera ET5
vs
Front view of LG LM8600

LG LM8600

Change »
  • 55" 1080p LED-backlit
  • 3D 480 Hz
  • Internet enabled
Released February, 2012
The problem is that this screen is a looker and very low profile while having a good size image.
Rated 20% by by TXAlex (Mar, 2012)
 
  • 47" LCD
  • 3D
  • Internet enabled
Announced January, 2012
LG says the processor is needed, though, for the voice navigation technology inside the "four-mode" remote.
by c|net (Jan, 2012)
 

Conclusion Which is better for you?

86%
55%
View Details
56%
61%
100%
100%
View Details
66%
75%
View Details

Winner

Samsung8000 Series (2012 LCD)

77
73

Features Key features of the Samsung 8000 Series (2012 LCD) compared to the LG LM8600

55

LED-backlit

Front view of Samsung 8000 Series (2012 LCD)
That said the other LCDs also maintained black quite well, as did the VT50 plasma which, after the Sharp, had the best overall bright-room picture in the lineup.
Rated 66% by by c|net (Jul, 2012)
Front view of LG LM8600

47

LCD

First PCs, then mobile, and now TVs: all have succumbed to the "dual-processor = better" marketing ploy, and LG makes much of the fact that the TV features an LG Dual Core chipset.
by c|net (Jan, 2012)

size

55"
47"
I performed a hands-on evaluation of the 55-inch Samsung UN55ES8000, but this review also applies to the other screen sizes in the series.
8000 Series (2012 LCD) by c|net (Jul, 2012)
The 3D when watching original 3D content is outstanding, specially taking into consideration that it's a passive 3D TV (with all the too-talked-about half-resolution 3D discussions - it still looks like full HD, whether it really is or isn't) with bright colors and deep, real-like, blacks.
LM8600 by J.-Roman (May, 2012)
 

Performance Real world tests of Samsung 8000 Series (2012 LCD) vs LG LM8600

 

Differences What are the advantages of each

Advantages compared to the LG LM8600

Bigger 55" vs 47"
More than 15% bigger

Advantages compared to the Samsung 8000 Series (2012 LCD)

Significantly more highly reviewed by consumers 74.76% vs 66.09%
Around 15% more highly reviewed by consumers

Reviews Word on the street

Samsung 8000 Series (2012 LCD)

LG LM8600

Rated 66% by 81 users at amazon.com
I will say it's much lighter than previous models, and a bit nicer looking, and it has the wifi built in which is great.
Rated 20% by by Rick--Rick (Jun, 2012)
I even put in the 1989 Batman blu ray and was blown away at the quality.
Rated 80% by by Jaciel-Torres (Aug, 2012)
The aesthetics are very pleasing to the eye and its very quick and responsive.
Rated 80% by by Jaciel-Torres (Aug, 2012)
Rated 74% by 49 users at amazon.com
Every aspect from streaming to the tv to watching old shows the 240 hertz throws regular shows into looking like high quality soap operas, and watching movies is rediculously awesome.
Rated 100% by by Jay-Thomas-Evans-Jr. (Jan, 2013)
While videophiles would differ, I like the bright, vibrant colors on this TV much better than that of my backlit Vizio.
Rated 80% by by Ramkumar-Balaraman
It is also nice wearing the passive glasses as they are lighter and don't need to be recharged...and if you need new glasses they are so cheap.
Rated 80% by by Adam-Turney (Nov, 2012)

Discussions Get involved, ask your question about the Samsung 8000 Series (2012 LCD) and LG LM8600

Samsung
8000 Series (2012 LCD)
LG
LM8600

Select aspects that are most important to you: (max 3)

Popular tags: