Compare with...

  • Sony HX850
  • Samsung 7500 Series
  • Panasonic Viera GT50
  • Panasonic Viera VT50
  • Panasonic Viera ET5
  • Plasma
  • 3D
Announced January, 2012
Although it couldn't deliver the reference-level charts seen on the 2011 Samsung plasmas, the color of the E8000 looks great in person, too.
Rated 79% by by c|net (Apr, 2012)
 
  • 55" LCD
  • 3D
  • Internet enabled
Released February, 2012
Colors on the other sets, in particular the Vizio, the Samsung ES8000, and the Panasonic plasma had a richer, more pleasing look in my side-by-side comparison.
Rated 71% by by c|net (Sep, 2012)
 

Conclusion Which is better for you?

33%
51%
View Details
33%
100%
100%
100%
View Details
74%
78%
View Details

Winner

LGLM7600

60
82

Features Key features of the Samsung 8000 Series (2012 Plasma) compared to the LG LM7600

Unknown

Plasma

View of Samsung 8000 Series (2012 Plasma)
Although it was very good, the screen of the Samsung plasma didn't perform quite as well overall as that of the ST50 in brighter rooms.
Rated 79% by by c|net (Apr, 2012)
Front view of LG LM7600

55

LCD

It didn't dim or disperse reflections as well as the true matte sets in the lineup - the Sharp and the Sony - but it did a better job of handling them than either of the Samsung ES8000 or the Panasonic, and pretty much tied the less-mirrorlike ES6500.
Rated 71% by by c|net (Sep, 2012)
 

Performance Real world tests of Samsung 8000 Series (2012 Plasma) vs LG LM7600

 

Differences What are the advantages of each

Advantages compared to the LG LM7600

Sortable is not aware of any important advantages of the Samsung 8000 Series (2012 Plasma) vs the LG LM7600.

Advantages compared to the Samsung 8000 Series (2012 Plasma)

More highly reviewed by consumers 77.59% vs 74.42%
Almost the same

Reviews Word on the street

Samsung 8000 Series (2012 Plasma)

LG LM7600

Rated 79%
Read the review (Apr, 2012)
Like all Samsung 3D models, and unlike other major-brand TVs that use active 3D technology, the PNE8000 actually comes with 3D glasses: two pairs are packed into every box.
Rated 71%
Read the review (Sep, 2012)
Yes, the LM7600 costs more than many of its competitors, particularly the excellent Vizio M3D0KD, the very good Sharp LC-LE640U, and a few of the best plasmas, but it might be worth the dough to people seeking a cutting-edge LED TV with all the fixins' and a good picture.
Rated 69% by 15 users at amazon.com
This TV is so amazing and the quality of the picture is so clear.
Rated 100% by by APRIL-D-SAKOUK (Nov, 2012)
If your a fan of 3D the 3D on this TV is great.
Rated 100% by by jjperron75 (Apr, 2012)
Did not use the 3D as much as I thought I would, but the built in allshare is great.
Rated 100% by by Rand (Apr, 2013)
Rated 84% by 316 users at amazon.com
The picture was fantastic, 3D was very impressive given that I had heard passive 3D was not as good.
Rated 100% by by Ace-Traveller (Dec, 2012)
The LM7600 series of LG TV is excellent quality product, very good resolution, the 3D is amazing.
Rated 100% by by Pablo (Oct, 2012)
This TV has the BEST picture I've ever seen!! Sharp and crisp.
Rated 100% by by Rise-Narens (Oct, 2012)

Discussions Get involved, ask your question about the Samsung 8000 Series (2012 Plasma) and LG LM7600

Samsung
8000 Series (2012 Plasma)
LG
LM7600

Select aspects that are most important to you: (max 3)

Popular tags: