- Conclusion Get the lowdown
- Features How they compare
- Performance Real world benchmarks
- Differences Technical showdown
- Reviews Word on the street
- Competition Others to consider
- Discussion Answers and opinions
Compare with...
- Panasonic VIERA E30
- Toshiba REGZA HL167
- LG LD350
- NEXUS NX2404L
- Panasonic VIERA U1
-front.jpg)
Rated 100% by by Nick (Jul, 2012)I have also found it nice that I can change the screen resolution to fit whatever I'm watching.
Conclusion Which is better for you?
Features Key features of the Toshiba SL415U compared to the Philips 4000 Series (2011)
“32
LCD
Rated 20% by by R.-E.-CARLISLE--He-s-just-this-guy (Nov, 2011)The DLNA streaming works well, much better than my hardwired Samsung.
-front.jpg)
40”
LED-backlit
Rated 80% by by Jason-Martin--Jay (Nov, 2012)The body is sleek and modern, it's only an inch thick and it looks great in my house!
size
32"
40"
SL415U by Mirza-Smailhodzic--lejber (Nov, 2011)Quite contrary, my AWOL has great picture and you can see everything in high resolution.
4000 Series (2011) by Siran-ger (Mar, 2012)I think of these "Flat Screen TVs" as very, very large monitors so I tend not to expect them to have the best sound.
thickness
SL415U by Michael-Matson (Dec, 2011)The picture is very good in my opinion.-The TV is extremely thin and has an attractive form factor.
4000 Series (2011) by Jason-A--Jason-A. (Oct, 2012)The picture is great, sound isnt too good but you can expect much from such a thin TV.
Performance Real world tests of Toshiba SL415U vs Philips 4000 Series (2011)
Differences What are the advantages of each
Advantages compared to the Philips 4000 Series (2011)
| Has built-in Ethernet | Yes | vs | No |
|---|---|---|---|
| Somewhat common; access streaming content over the Internet | |||
| Is DLNA DMP | Yes | vs | No |
| Somewhat common; easier to share and enjoy your digital photos, music and video | |||
| Has Wi-Fi | built-in, 802.11n | vs | None |
| Most TVs don't have Wi-Fi; access streaming content with no wires | |||
| More USB ports | 2 | vs | 1 |
| Twice as many USB ports | |||
| Lighter | 8,500 g | vs | 19,799 g |
| 2.3x lighter | |||
-front.jpg)
Advantages compared to the Toshiba SL415U
| Much better video mode | 1080p | vs | 720p |
|---|---|---|---|
| Around 2.5x better best resolution | |||
| Bigger | 40" | vs | 32" |
| Around 30% bigger | |||
| Significantly more highly reviewed by consumers | 77.48% | vs | 68.37% |
| More than 10% more highly reviewed by consumers | |||
Reviews Word on the street
Toshiba SL415U | Philips 4000 Series (2011) | ||
 |    Rated by 55 users at amazon.com Rated 80% by by John-Wong (Jan, 2012) | Rated by 56 users at amazon.com Rated 40% by by M.-ZAK (May, 2012) Rated 100% by by Delta (Mar, 2012) Rated 60% by by cesaric (May, 2012) | |
|---|---|---|---|
Competition What else you should consider
 | 1 | Panasonic VIERA E30 2-way tie: Is DLNA DMP |
 | 2 | Toshiba REGZA HL167 4-way tie: Has CEC |
 | 3 | LG LD350 Rated the best by consumers |
 | 4 | NEXUS NX2404L 6-way tie: OK video mode |
 | 6 | Sceptre Inc. X402BV-FHD 5-way tie: More HDMI ports |
 | 7 | LG EM9600 Biggest screen |
 | 8 | Vizio R3D 470VS Fastest refresh rate |
