Exchange bidding, also known as Exchange Bidding in Dynamic Allocation (EBDA), is a server-side unified auction where ad exchanges and SSPs compete with Google Ad Exchange to win impressions. Exchange bidding was Google’s response to header bidding and the need to reduce the complexity of header bidding.
Prior to switching to a first-price auction, Google Ad Exchange had the “last look” at all impressions and would have an opportunity to place the last bid. With last look, Google could essentially out-bid advertisers of an impression by a very small margin which wasn’t particularly liked by many publishers. Google’s introduction of exchange bidding allows other exchanges and SSPs to compete with Google Ad Exchange in a unified auction creating an equal playing field.
What’s the process of exchange bidding?
- An ad request is triggered and passed to the Ad Manager ad server.
- Ad Manager runs a unified auction to determine the best yield for the available inventory.
a) Ad Manager selects the best trafficked line item to compete.
b) A bid request is sent out to all yield partners (Ad Exchange, third-party exchanges, and networks).
c) Yield partners run their own auction and return to Ad Manager with the most competitive bid.
d) Ad Manager hosts a unified auction and selects a winner.
- Finally, Ad Manager returns the request to the page and the winner’s ad is displayed on the publisher’s ad space.
Why exchange bidding?
Exchange bidding is beneficial to publishers for the following reasons:
Easy implementation — Ad Exchange is handled server-side so for publishers, there is nothing to be installed on their website(s). This also means there is no need for updates or maintenance.
Better user experience — More publishers are preferring the exchange bidding process when reduced latency produces a better user experience.
What’s the difference between exchange bidding and header bidding?
|Exchange bidding||Header bidding|
|Level of technical knowledge required||Minimal||Advanced|
|Advantages||Reduced page latency and overall reduced ad complexity||Greater transparency and control, with better cookie matching|
|Disadvantages||Less transparency, lack of cookie matching||Increased page latency, increased ad complexity|
|Payments||Managed by Google||Managed by individual publishers|
There will always be pros and cons between header bidding and exchange bidding. Neither is necessarily better than the other. In fact, header bidding takes place in the user’s browser before the highest bid is sent to Google Ad Manager to conduct an exchange bidding auction. These auctions can work cohesively together or separately. As a publisher, it’s about your needs and what you want out of your ad monetization. If you’re interested in exploring exchange bidding, Sortable can help. We are partnered with Index Exchange, OpenX, Rubicon, PubMatic, and Yieldmo (among others), all of which support EBDA.
If you want to learn more about exchange bidding or find ways to maximize your ad revenue, contact email@example.com. If you aren’t a Sortable customer but want to learn how Sortable’s solution stacks up against the competition, and has the best analytics platform in the industry, request a demo today and start on your path to earning more.
Waterfall Yield Management
Being publishers ourselves, we have dealt with this issue in the past and have developed an Ad Optimization System to help optimize our ad inventory.
Determining which ad unit will produce the highest yield requires a great deal of data. With around 1 billion ad impressions served each month, this system allows us to analyse a great deal of traffic profiles and demand partners under different circumstances. Using our proprietary multi-variant testing allows us to create a profile of different publishers’ site traffic. This model evolves over time, further improving ad performance.
Using machine learning and our decision engine technology, we are able to make real-time decisions to help publishers stack the deck in their favor. Every time an ad is displayed to a user, our technology will analyse the available ad inventory and decide which ad network is going to serve the ad with the highest CPM. If that network doesn't fill the impression, our system will record that and passback the impression to the second best network until the ad is served.
Our Ad Optimization System puts publishers in control by speeding up their ad deployment, decreasing loss, and increasing yield, all without having to manually adjust their ad stack.